Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35543888›Full record

Trial reportPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2022

Deeply Tailored Adaptive Interventions to Reduce College Student Drinking: a Real-World Application of Q-Learning for SMART Studies.

Grace R Lyden, David M Vock, Aparajita Sur, Nicole Morrell, Christine M Lee, Megan E Patrick

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03930524 (An Adaptive Preventive Intervention to Optimize the Transition From Universal to Indicated Resources for College Student Alcohol Use), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03930524 nacompletednot on this map

An Adaptive Preventive Intervention to Optimize the Transition From Universal to Indicated Resources for College Student Alcohol Use

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2019 to 2022Enrolled891ConditionsCollege Student DrinkingArmsPersonalized Normative Feedback (PNF), Self-Monitoring (SM), Web-BASICS, Health Promotion Consultation, M-Bridge Online Health Coach
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Grace R LydenDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
David M VockDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Aparajita SurDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Nicole MorrellCenter for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Christine M LeeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Megan E PatrickSurvey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 426 Thompson St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106-1248, USA. meganpat@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3594-4944
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

An Adaptive Preventive Intervention to Optimize the Transition from Universal to Indicated Resources for College Student Alcohol UseR01AA026574 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PATRICK, MEGAN E. · 2018 to 2020
$1.3M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA026574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

M-bridge was a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) that aimed to develop a resource-efficient adaptive preventive intervention (API) to reduce binge drinking in first-year college students. The main results of M-bridge suggested no difference, on average, in binge drinking between students randomized to APIs versus assessment-only control, but certain elements of the API were beneficial for at-risk subgroups. This paper extends the main results of M-bridge through an exploratory analysis using Q-learning, a novel algorithm from the computer science literature. Specifically, we sought to further tailor the two aspects of the M-bridge APIs to an individual and test whether deep tailoring offers a benefit over assessment-only control. Q-learning is a method to estimate decision rules that assign optimal treatment (i.e., to minimize binge drinking) based on student characteristics. For the first aspect of the M-bridge API (when to offer), we identified the optimal tailoring characteristic post hoc from a set of 20 candidate variables. For the second (how to bridge), we used a known effect modifier from the trial. The results of our analysis are two rules that optimize (1) the timing of universal intervention for each student based on their motives for drinking and (2) the bridging strategy to indicated interventions (i.e., among those who continue to drink heavily mid-semester) based on mid-semester binge drinking frequency. We estimate that this newly tailored API, if offered to all first-year students, would reduce binge drinking by 1 occasion per 2.5 months (95% CI: decrease of 1.45 to 0.28 occasions, p < 0.01) on average. Our analyses demonstrate a real-world implementation of Q-learning for a substantive purpose, and, if replicable in future trials, our results have practical implications for college campuses aiming to reduce student binge drinking.

Indexed as

Alcohol Drinking in CollegeBinge DrinkingAlcohol DrinkingEthanolHumansStudentsUniversitiesEthanolAdaptive treatment strategiesAlcoholDynamic treatment regimesm-out-of-n bootstrapReinforcement learningSequential multiple assignment randomized trialSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID35543888
PMCPMC9357163
OpenAlexW4280524566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.