ArticleInternational ophthalmology2022
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire into Persian (CVS-Q FA
Article in International ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of computer vision syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of optometryPooled it
- Refractive Error Changes at Near After Smartphone Use.Beyoglu eye journal · 2026Article
- Development and psychometric evaluation of the Osteoporosis Preventing Behaviors Questionnaire (OPBQ) based on pender's health promotion model.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Prevalence and contributing factors of computer vision syndrome among university students in Iran: a cross-sectional study.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Reliability assessment of the malay version visual comfort questionnaire for schoolchildren with visual impairment.PloS one · 2025Article
- CVS-Q teen: an adapted, reliable and validated tool to assess computer vision syndrome in adolescents.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Visual, ocular surface, and extraocular diagnostic criteria for determining the prevalence of computer vision syndrome: a cross-sectional smart-survey-based study.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024Article
- The Chinese version of the Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire: translation and cross-cultural adaptation.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Cross-cultural validation into Portuguese of a questionnaire to assess computer vision syndrome in workers exposed to digital devices.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2023Article
- Cultural adaptation and validation of the Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire in Colombia.Revista CuidarteArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo translate, cross-culturally adapt and validate the Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS-Q
methodsThis study was carried out in 2 phases: (1) the CVS-Q
resultsThe translation and cross-cultural adaptation process was performed successfully according to accepted scientific recommendations without any major difficulties. The I-CVI was above 0.80 for all items (symptoms) except item 15 (feeling that sight is worsening) and the S-CVI was 0.92. The CVS-Q FA
conclusionThe CVS-Q FA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.