Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35543836›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychology review2023

Prospective Memory Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Zita C K Tse, Yuan Cao, James M Ogilvie, Bolton K H Chau, Daphne H C Ng, David H K Shum

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychology review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cognitive interventions for healthy older adults: A systematic meta-review.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zita C K TseDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-7361-7982
Yuan CaoDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-5635-9253
James M OgilvieGrififth Criminology Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2294-5665
Bolton K H ChauDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-6854-5176
Daphne H C Ng *Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-8215-0656
David H K ShumDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. david.shum@polyu.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0002-4810-9262

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prospective memory (PM), which enables one to remember to carry out delayed intentions, is crucial for everyday functioning. PM commonly deteriorates upon cognitive decline in older adults, but several studies have shown that PM in older adults can be improved by training. The current study aimed to summarise this evidence by conducting a qualitative systematic analysis and quantitative meta-analysis of the effects of PM training in older adults, for which systematic searches were conducted across seven databases (Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, CINAHL and Scopus). Forty-eight studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and 43% of the assessed PM training interventions showed positive gains in enhancing PM. However, the methodological quality varied across the studies, with 41% of the non-randomised control trials (non-RCTs) rated as having either serious or critical risk of bias. Therefore, only 29 RCTs were included in the subsequent quantitative meta-analysis. We found a significant and moderate immediate efficacy (Hedges' g = 0.54) of PM training in enhancing PM performance in older adults, but no significant long-term efficacy (Hedges' g = 0.20). Two subgroup analyses also revealed a robust training efficacy across the study population (i.e., healthy and clinical population) and the number of training sessions (i.e., single session and programme-based). Overall, this study provided positive evidence to support PM training in older adults. Further studies are warranted to explore the mechanisms by which PM training exerts its effects, and better-quality RCTs are needed to provide more robust evidence supporting our findings.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionMemory, EpisodicAgedCognitionCognitive TrainingHumansAgeingMeta-analysisOlder adultsProspective memory

Identifiers

PMID35543836
PMCPMC10148783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.