Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35543762›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2022

Artificial intelligence in predicting early-onset adjacent segment degeneration following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Samuel S Rudisill, Alexander L Hornung, J Nicolás Barajas, Jack J Bridge, G Michael Mallow, Wylie Lopez, Arash J Sayari, Philip K Louie, Garrett K Harada, Youping Tao and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Development and validation of a deep learning radiomics model for predicting adjacent segment degeneration following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Advances and challenges in AI-assisted MRI for lumbar disc degeneration detection and classification.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  5. A prediction model for postoperative respiratory failure in patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury using interpretable machine learning.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Is ABO blood type a risk factor for adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spine fusion?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel S RudisillDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1325-4395
Alexander L HornungDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Nicolás BarajasDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jack J BridgeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, USA.
G Michael MallowDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, USA.
Wylie LopezDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, USA.
Arash J SayariDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, USA.
Philip K LouieVirginia Mason Medical Center, Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Garrett K HaradaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, USA.
Youping TaoInstitute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Ulm University Medical Centre, Ulm, Germany.
Hans-Joachim WilkeInstitute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Ulm University Medical Centre, Ulm, Germany.
Matthew W ColmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, USA.
Frank M PhillipsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, USA.
Howard S AnDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, USA.
Dino SamartzisDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, USA. Dino_Samartzis@rush.edu.
Rush University Medical Center · USVirginia Mason Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common surgical treatment for degenerative disease in the cervical spine. However, resultant biomechanical alterations may predispose to early-onset adjacent segment degeneration (EO-ASD), which may become symptomatic and require reoperation. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model to predict EO-ASD following ACDF.

methodsRetrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients undergoing ACDF at a quaternary referral medical center was performed. Patients > 18 years of age with > 6 months of follow-up and complete pre- and postoperative X-ray and MRI imaging were included. An ML-based algorithm was developed to predict EO-ASD based on preoperative demographic, clinical, and radiographic parameters, and model performance was evaluated according to discrimination and overall performance.

resultsIn total, 366 ACDF patients were included (50.8% male, mean age 51.4 ± 11.1 years). Over 18.7 ± 20.9 months of follow-up, 97 (26.5%) patients developed EO-ASD. The model demonstrated good discrimination and overall performance according to precision (EO-ASD: 0.70, non-ASD: 0.88), recall (EO-ASD: 0.73, non-ASD: 0.87), accuracy (0.82), F1-score (0.79), Brier score (0.203), and AUC (0.794), with C4/C5 posterior disc bulge, C4/C5 anterior disc bulge, C6 posterior superior osteophyte, presence of osteophytes, and C6/C7 anterior disc bulge identified as the most important predictive features.

conclusionsThrough an ML approach, the model identified risk factors and predicted development of EO-ASD following ACDF with good discrimination and overall performance. By addressing the shortcomings of traditional statistics, ML techniques can support discovery, clinical decision-making, and precision-based spine care.

Indexed as

Intervertebral Disc DegenerationSpinal FusionAdultArtificial IntelligenceCervical VertebraeDiskectomyFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAdjacent segmentAnterior cervical discectomyArtificial intelligenceCervical spineDegenerationDiscFusionMachine learningOutcomesPredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID35543762
OpenAlexW4280513143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.