Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35543748›Full record

SynthesisInternational orthopaedics2022

Thromboembolic events in pelvic and acetabulum fractures: a systematic review of the current literature on incidence, screening, and thromboprophylaxis.

Samer Ss Mahmoud, Max Esser, Arvind Jain

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07165587 (Venous Thromboembolism in Pelvic Ring and Acetabular Fractures - A Prospective Cohort Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07165587 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Venous Thromboembolism in Pelvic Ring and Acetabular Fractures - A Prospective Cohort Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorDepartment of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery at Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, BG Klinik TuRan2024 to 2024Enrolled81ConditionsPelvic Fractures, Acetabular Fractures, Pelvic Trauma, Venous Thromboembolic EventArmsBilateral duplex ultrasonography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Timing of venous thromboemboli in patients with acetabular and pelvic ring fractures.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samer Ss MahmoudThe Alfred Hospital, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. samermahmoud@me.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2414-2364
Max EsserDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Arvind JainDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
The Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRates of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) as high as 41% deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were reported in association with pelvic and acetabular fractures (PAFs). There is no clear consensus on VTE prophylaxis for PAFs. Extracting evidence-based guidelines is key to overcome this challenging complication. The aims of this review are (A) to highlight the incidence of VTEs in PAFs, (B) to examine the screening and prophylaxis methods available in the current literature, and (C) direct future creation of a best practice protocol to reduce the risk of VTE in PAFs.

methodsWe performed a systematic search of Medline, EMBASE databases, and the Cochrane library. MESH terms were used to identify studies pertinent to VTE in PAFs, including incidence, prophylaxis, and screening.

resultsIn total, 28 studies were identified and grouped into four categories including incidence, screening, prophylaxis, and the use of inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs). Incidence of VTE ranged from 0.21 to 41% for DVT and 0 to 21.7% for PE. Nine studies screened 1360 patients using different imaging modalities. Ten articles, 2836 patients, examined different thromboprophylaxis protocols. Two out of three studies investigating the use of IVCF showed significant reduction of the rates of PE.

conclusionIncidence of VTE in PAF varies significantly with different protocols. The current literature shows that screening is still controversial. The combination of chemical and mechanical prophylaxis starting at 24 hours from the injury would provide the best protection. Guidelines were extracted; however, higher level multicenter studies are still required to guide future protocols.

Indexed as

Pulmonary EmbolismVenous ThromboembolismVenous ThrombosisAcetabulumAnticoagulantsHumansIncidenceAnticoagulantsAcetabulumFracturePelvisProphylaxisVena cava filterVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID35543748
OpenAlexW4280536062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.