Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35543482›Full record

ArticleFuture oncology (London, England)2022

A plain language summary from pembrolizumab plus ipilimumab following PD-1 antibody failure in melanoma.

Daniel J Olson, Jason J Luke

Open access · hybridAbstract readCommentPatient Education Handout
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Future oncology (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel J OlsonThe University of Chicago - Medicine, 5841 S Maryland Ave MC 2115, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Jason J LukeUPMC Ringgold standard institution, 5150 Centre Ave. Room 564, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2582, USA.
University of Chicago · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: In this article, we discuss the results of our clinical study that looked at the use of two immunotherapy drugs for the treatment of advanced melanoma. Melanoma is considered advanced when it is no longer curable with surgery. WHAT HAPPENED IN THE STUDY?: The two-drug combination, pembrolizumab and ipilimumab, was given to people with melanoma who's cancer had progressed. This study looked at how effective these two drugs were in terms of controlling the melanoma, as well their safety. These results from the study were then compared to the results from previous studies looking at melanoma treatment with ipilimumab on its own, which previously had been the most commonly used drug. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: The study, originally published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, showed that combination treatment with pembrolizumab and ipilimumab was more likely to be effective than ipilimumab on its own. Not all of the study participants benefited, but many of those who did benefit experienced long-term remission from their melanoma without needing more treatment. Around 1/3 of the participants in the study had their tumors shrink compared to previous studies, which showed that ipilimumab was expected to shrink 1 in 8 tumors. The rates of side effects were similar with the pembrolizumab and ipilimumab combination compared to ipilimumab alone.

Indexed as

MelanomaProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansIpilimumabLanguageAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedIpilimumabpembrolizumabProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptoradvanced melanomaantibodiesimmune checkpoint inhibitorsimmunotherapyipilimumabpembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID35543482
OpenAlexW4280642640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.