Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35543169›Full record

SynthesisJournal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society2022

What Role Does Geragogy Play in the Delivery of Digital Skills Programs for Middle and Older Age Adults? A Systematic Narrative Review.

Jessica R Gates, Gemma Wilson-Menzfeld

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. "To Remember Is to Live Again": Geragogical Approaches to Online Storytelling With Older Immigrants.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Educational Concepts of Digital Competence Development for Older Adults-A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jessica R GatesFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8934-025X
Gemma Wilson-MenzfeldFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7362-7048

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic narrative review aimed to explore the implementation and delivery of digital skills programs for middle and older age adults; and understand the presence of adult learning theory (namely, geragogy/critical geragogy) in their delivery. A database search was undertaken to examine international literature, published between 2010 and 2020. From 1,713 papers identified during the database searches, 17 papers were included. Thematic synthesis was used to analyze the papers in this review. Themes were generated relating to the implementation and delivery of digital skills programs: negative perceptions of aging; the learning environment; and value of technology. The role of geragogy/critical geragogy is not explicit in the delivery of digital skills programs in this review but has an underlying thread of empowerment and embodies the ethos of these learning theories to some extent. The findings of this review have been used to develop recommendations for delivering digital skills to older adults.

Indexed as

AgingLearningAgedHumansagingdigital dividedigital literacygeragogygerontechnologyskills trainingtechnology

Identifiers

PMID35543169
PMCPMC9364233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.