Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35543138›Full record

ArticleClinical transplantation2022

Impact of medical eligibility criteria and OPTN policy on simultaneous liver kidney allocation and utilization.

Ashwani K Singal, Yong-Fang Kuo, Paul Kwo, Nadim Mahmud, Pratima Sharma, Mitra K Nadim

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical transplantation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. New kidney-after-heart allocation policy in the United States: Who would benefit from a rescue kidney?The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ashwani K SingalDepartment of Medicine, University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1207-3998
Yong-Fang KuoDepartment of Biostatistics and Preventive Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Paul KwoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical University, Stanford, California, USA.
Nadim MahmudDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1889-3954
Pratima SharmaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1182-0579
Mitra K NadimDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Stanford University · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of South Dakota · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Improving Surgical Risk Prediction and Decision Making among Patients with CirrhosisK08DK124577 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MAHMUD, NADIM · 2021 to 2025
$835k
NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK124577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrgan Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) implemented medical eligibility and safety-net policy on 8/10/17 to optimize simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) utilization. We examined impact of this policy on SLK listings and number of kidneys used within 1-yr. of receiving liver transplantation (LT) alone. METHODS AND

resultsOPTN database (08/10/14-06/12/20) on adults (N = 66 709) without previous transplant stratified candidates to listings for SLK or LT alone with pre-LT renal dysfunction at listing (eGFR < 30 mL/min or on dialysis). Outcomes were compared for pre (08/10/14-08/09/17) vs. post (08/10/17-06/12/20) policy era. SLK listings decreased in post vs. pre policy era (8.7% vs. 9.6%; P < .001), with 22% reduced odds of SLK listing in the postpolicy era, with a decrease in all OPTN regions except regions 6 and 8, which showed an increase. Among LT-alone recipients with pre-LT renal dysfunction (N = 3272), cumulative 1-year probability was higher in post vs. prepolicy period for dialysis (5.6% vs. 2.3%; P < .0001), KT listing (11.4% vs. 2.0%; P < .0001), and KT (3.7% vs. .25%; P < .0001). Sixty-seven (2.4%) kidneys were saved in post policy era, with 18.1%, 16.6%, 4.3%, and 2.9% saving from regions 7, 2, 11, and 1, respectively.

conclusionMedical eligibility and safety-net OPTN policy resulted in decreased SLK use and improved access to LT alone among those with pre-LT renal dysfunction. Although decreased in postpolicy era, regional variation of SLK listings remains. In spite of increased use of KT within 1-year of receiving LT alone under safety net, less number of kidneys were used without impact on patient survival in postpolicy era.

Indexed as

Kidney DiseasesKidney TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementAdultHumansKidneyLiverPolicycirrhosisdialysisESRDHRSOPTN

Identifiers

PMID35543138
PMCPMC9930183
OpenAlexW4280554347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.