ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2022
Validity of Online Versus In-Clinic Self-Reported Everyday Cognition Scale.
Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognitive and Behavioral Functioning in Female Former Soccer Players: Results from the Head Impact and Trauma Surveillance Study (HITSS).Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Clinical definition, biological characterization, and detection guidelines of subjective cognitive decline due to Alzheimer's disease and related dementia: A position paper from ISTAART SCD PIA.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Accuracy of Web-Based and In-Clinic Subjective Cognitive Decline Assessments in Detecting Cognitive Impairment: Multicohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- The mobile everyday cognition scale (mECog): Development and pilot testing.The Clinical neuropsychologist · 2025Article
- Subjective cognitive decline predicts longitudinal neuropsychological test performance in an unsupervised online setting in the Brain Health Registry.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
- Performance of a Short Version of the Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog-12) to Detect Cognitive Impairment.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2024Article
- The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative in the era of Alzheimer's disease treatment: A review of ADNI studies from 2021 to 2022.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Review
- Article
- Brain health registry updates: An online longitudinal neuroscience platform.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOnline cognitive assessments are alternatives to in-clinic assessments.
objectivesWe evaluated the relationship between online and in-clinic self-reported Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog).
methodsIn 94 Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and Brain Health Registry (ADNI-BHR) participants, we estimated associations between online and in-clinic Everyday Cognition using Bland-Altman plots and regression. In 472 ADNI participants, we estimated reliability of in-clinic Everyday Cognition completed six months apart using Bland-Altman plots and regression.
resultsOnline Everyday Cognition associations: Mean difference was 0.11 (95% limits of agreement: -0.41 to 0.64). In-clinic Everyday Cognition score increased by 0.81 for each online Everyday Cognition score unit increase (R2=0.60). In-clinic Everyday Cognition reliability: Mean difference was 0.01 (95% limits of agreement: -0.61 to 0.62). In-clinic Everyday Cognition score at enrollment increased by 0.79 for each in-clinic Everyday Cognition score unit increase at six months (R2=0.61).
conclusionOnline Everyday Cognition closely corresponded with in-clinic Everyday Cognition, supporting validity of using online cognitive assessments to more efficiently facilitate Alzheimer's disease research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.