ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2022
Unsupervised Performance of the CogState Brief Battery in the Brain Health Registry: Implications for Detecting Cognitive Decline.
Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Cognitive Testing in Mitochondrial Disease: Validity and Challenges for Clinical Trial Use.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- Remote, unsupervised assessment of cognitive impairment and decline in Alzheimer's disease using the Cogstate Brief Battery in ADNI-3.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Hearing technology and the brain: cognitive function in different hearing device users.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Review
- Subjective cognitive decline predicts longitudinal neuropsychological test performance in an unsupervised online setting in the Brain Health Registry.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
- Unsupervised Online Paired Associates Learning Task from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB®) in the Brain Health Registry.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2024Article
- Brain health registry updates: An online longitudinal neuroscience platform.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023Article
- American Football Play and Parkinson Disease Among Men.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Moving intra-individual variability (IIV) towards clinical utility: IIV measured using a commercial testing platform.Journal of the neurological sciences · 2023Article
- Associations between Participant Characteristics and Participant Feedback about an Unsupervised Online Cognitive Assessment in a Research Registry.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe feasibility and validity of unsupervised, longitudinal brief computerized cognitive batteries is unknown.
methodsParticipants aged 56-90 (N = 19476) from the Brain Health Registry (BHR) completed the CogState Brief Battery (CBB) at 6-month intervals over a period of 5 years. We used linear mixed-effects models to assess whether cross-sectional and longitudinal performance on CBB within BHR was associated with demographic and cognitive characteristics. We also defined a group of CBB decliners based on subject-specific slopes and estimated associations between decliner status and participant characteristics.
resultsWe found weak associations between longitudinal change in CBB and participant characteristics. Cross-sectional CBB scores were significantly associated with participant characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, self-reported disease status, and memory concern. CBB decliners were more likely to self-report mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and memory concerns. DISCUSSION: Cross-sectional, remote CBB shows evidence of construct validity, but our results suggest that longitudinal assessment may not provide additional value for identifying those at risk for and with cognitive impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.