Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35542754›Full record

ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2022

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Lesions: Single-Institutional Prospective Study of Qualitative and Quantitative CEUS Characteristics.

Hana Petrasova, Radka Slaisova, Tomas Rohan, Karel Stary, Jitka Kyclova, Tomas Pavlik, Petra Kovalcikova, Tomas Kazda, Vlastimil Valek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hana PetrasovaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Brno 625 00, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8473-1924
Radka SlaisovaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Brno 625 00, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8124-7619
Tomas RohanDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Brno 625 00, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7105-583X
Karel StaryDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Brno, Brno 625 00, Czech Republic.
Jitka KyclovaThe Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Brno, Brno 625 00, Czech Republic.
Tomas PavlikThe Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University Brno, Brno 602 00, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7166-032X
Petra KovalcikovaThe Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University Brno, Brno 602 00, Czech Republic.
Tomas KazdaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno 656 53, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7288-8975
Vlastimil ValekDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Brno 625 00, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To extend and revise the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) for differentiation between malignant and benign thyroid nodules. Methods: This single-institution prospective study aims to compare CEUS qualitative and objective quantitative parameters in benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Consecutive cohort of 100 patients was examined by CEUS, 68 out of them were further analysed in detail. All included patients underwent cytological and/or histopathological verification of the diagnosis. Results: Fifty-five (81%) thyroid nodules were benign, and 13 (19%) were malignant. Ring enhancement pattern was strongly associated with a benign aetiology (positive predictive value 100%) and heterogeneous enhancement pattern with malignant aetiology (positive predictive value 72.7%). The shape of the TIC (time-intensity curve) was more often identical in the benign lesion (98.2%) than in malignant lesions (69.2%), Conclusions: This study indicates that CEUS enhancement patterns were significantly different in benign and malignant lesions. Ring enhancement was a very strong indicator of benign lesions, whereas heterogeneous enhancement was valuable to detect malignant lesions.

Indexed as

Thyroid NoduleContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID35542754
PMCPMC9056255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.