Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35542386›Full record

ReviewCurrent developments in nutrition2022

Dietary Patterns and the Risk of Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mary E Van Elswyk, Lynn Teo, Clara S Lau, Christopher J Shanahan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current developments in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mary E Van ElswykVan Elswyk Consulting, Inc., Clark, CO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4579-0072
Lynn TeoTeo Research Consulting, Portland, ME, USA.
Clara S LauNational Cattlemen's Beef Association, a contractor to the Beef Checkoff, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3667-4539
Christopher J ShanahanUnleash Creatives, LLC, Reynoldsburg, OH, USA.
National Cattlemen's Beef Association · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the relationship between dietary patterns and sarcopenia using a protocol developed for use by the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, and to conduct a meta-analysis to summarize the evidence. Multiple electronic databases were searched for studies investigating sarcopenia risk factors or risk of sarcopenia and dietary patterns. Eligible studies were

Indexed as

agingcluster analysisdietary patterndiet indexdiet scorefactor analysismacronutrientmusclephysical functionsarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID35542386
PMCPMC9071101
OpenAlexW4205922600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.