Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35542313›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of data science and analytics2022

An iterative topic model filtering framework for short and noisy user-generated data: analyzing conspiracy theories on twitter.

Gillian Kant, Levin Wiebelt, Christoph Weisser, Krisztina Kis-Katos, Mattias Luber, Benjamin Säfken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of data science and analytics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gillian KantUniversity of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2346-2841
Levin WiebeltUniversity of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Christoph WeisserCampus-Institut Data Science (CIDAS), University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0616-1027
Krisztina Kis-KatosCampus-Institut Data Science (CIDAS), University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2459-1274
Mattias LuberUniversity of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Benjamin SäfkenCampus-Institut Data Science (CIDAS), University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4702-3333

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conspiracy theories have seen a rise in popularity in recent years. Spreading quickly through social media, their disruptive effect can lead to a biased public view on policy decisions and events. We present a novel approach for LDA-pre-processing called Iterative Filtering to study such phenomena based on Twitter data. In combination with Hashtag Pooling as an additional pre-processing step, we are able to achieve a coherent framing of the discussion and topics of interest, despite of the inherent noisiness and sparseness of Twitter data. Our novel approach enables researchers to gain detailed insights into discourses of interest on Twitter, allowing them to identify tweets iteratively that are related to an investigated topic of interest. As an application, we study the dynamics of conspiracy-related topics on US Twitter during the last four months of 2020, which were dominated by the US-Presidential Elections and Covid-19. We monitor the public discourse in the USA with geo-spatial Twitter data to identify conspiracy-related contents by estimating Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) Topic Models. We find that in this period, usual conspiracy-related topics played a marginal role in comparison with dominating topics, such as the US-Presidential Elections or the general discussions about Covid-19. The main conspiracy theories in this period were the ones linked to "Election Fraud" and the "Covid-19-hoax." Conspiracy-related keywords tended to appear together with Trump-related words and words related to his presidential campaign.

Indexed as

Conspiracy theoriesCovid-19Geo-spatial analysisHashtag poolingIterative filteringLatent Dirichlet allocationLDANLPNLP pre-processingSARS-CoV-2Sentiment analysis

Identifiers

PMID35542313
PMCPMC9072765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.