ReviewRSC advances2018
Additive manufacturing technique-designed metallic porous implants for clinical application in orthopedics.
Review in RSC advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Porcelain Fused to Titanium-Advantages and Challenges.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Augmenting osteoporotic osseointegration through a temporal release nanocoating-based reversing dysregulated osteogenic microenvironment.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Article
- Exploring the frontiers of metal additive manufacturing in orthopaedic implant development.MethodsX · 2024Review
- Early clinical efficacy of 3D-printed artificial vertebral body in spinal reconstruction after total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal tumors.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Article
- 3D printing metal implants in orthopedic surgery: Methods, applications and future prospects.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2023Review
- An overview of 3D printed metal implants in orthopedic applications: Present and future perspectives.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Filling the gap: a series of 3D-printed titanium truss cages for the management of large, lower limb bone defects in a developing country setting.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023Article
- Tantalum as Trabecular Metal for Endosseous Implantable Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- 3D Printability Assessment of Poly(octamethylene maleate (anhydride) citrate) and Poly(ethylene glycol) Diacrylate Copolymers for Biomedical Applications.ACS applied polymer materials · 2022Article
- 3D Printing: Applications in Tissue Engineering, Medical Devices, and Drug Delivery.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2022Review
- Numerical Evaluation of a Porous Tibial-Knee Implant using Gyroid Structure.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2022Article
- Anatomical Engineering and 3D Printing for Surgery and Medical Devices: International Review and Future Exponential Innovations.BioMed research international · 2022Review
- A Critical Review on the Design, Manufacturing and Assessment of the Bone Scaffold for Large Bone Defects.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Powder based additive manufacturing for biomedical application of titanium and its alloys: a review.Biomedical engineering letters · 2020Review
- A Review on 3D-Printed Templates for Precontouring Fixation Plates in Orthopedic Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Additive manufacturing of biodegradable porous orthopaedic screw.Bioactive materials · 2020Article
- Holistic Approach in Designing the Personalized Bone Scaffold: The Case of Reconstruction of Large Missing Piece of Mandible Caused by Congenital Anatomic Anomaly.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2020Article
- Three-dimensional printing of metals for biomedical applications.Materials today. Bio · 2019Review
- Titanium-Tissue Interface Reaction and Its Control With Surface Treatment.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional metallic scaffold prostheses, as vastly applied implants in clinical orthopedic operations, have achieved great success in rebuilding limb function. However, mismatch of bone defects and additional coating requirements limit the long-term survival of traditional prostheses. Recently, additive manufacturing (AM) has opened up unprecedented possibilities for producing complicated structures in prosthesis shapes and microporous surface designs of customized prostheses, which can solve the drawback of traditional prostheses mentioned above. This review presents the most commonly used metallic additive manufacturing techniques, the microporous structure design of metallic scaffolds, and novel applications of customized prostheses in the orthopedic field. Challenges and future perspectives on AM fabricated scaffolds are also summarized.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.