Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35541713›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2018

Manipulating extracellular tumour pH: an effective target for cancer therapy.

Guanyu Hao, Zhi Ping Xu, Li Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 126 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guanyu HaoAustralian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (AIBN), The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia 4072 l.li2@uq.edu.au gordonxu@uq.edu.au.
Zhi Ping XuAustralian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (AIBN), The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia 4072 l.li2@uq.edu.au gordonxu@uq.edu.au.
Li LiAustralian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (AIBN), The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia 4072 l.li2@uq.edu.au gordonxu@uq.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6545-858X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pH in tumour cells and the tumour microenvironment has played important roles in cancer development and treatment. It was thought that both the extracellular and intracellular pH values in tumours are acidic and lower than in normal cells. However, recent progress in the measurement of pH in tumour tissue has disclosed that the intracellular pH (pH

Identifiers

PMID35541713
PMCPMC9081285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.