Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35540864›Full record

ArticleSynthetic biology (Oxford, England)2022

A linear programming-based strategy to save pipette tips in automated DNA assembly.

Kirill Sechkar, Zoltan A Tuza, Guy-Bart Stan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Synthetic biology (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kirill SechkarDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2300-8278
Zoltan A TuzaDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2896-1527
Guy-Bart StanDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5560-902X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laboratory automation and mathematical optimization are key to improving the efficiency of synthetic biology research. While there are algorithms optimizing the construct designs and synthesis strategies for DNA assembly, the optimization of how DNA assembly reaction mixes are prepared remains largely unexplored. Here, we focus on reducing the pipette tip consumption of a liquid-handling robot as it delivers DNA parts across a multi-well plate where several constructs are being assembled in parallel. We propose a linear programming formulation of this problem based on the capacitated vehicle routing problem, as well as an algorithm which applies a linear programming solver to our formulation, hence providing a strategy to prepare a given set of DNA assembly mixes using fewer pipette tips. The algorithm performed well in randomly generated and real-life scenarios concerning several modular DNA assembly standards, proving to be capable of reducing the pipette tip consumption by up to [Formula: see text] in large-scale cases. Combining automatic process optimization and robotic liquid handling, our strategy promises to greatly improve the efficiency of DNA assembly, either used alone or combined with other algorithmic DNA assembly optimization methods. Graphical Abstract.

Indexed as

automationDNA assemblylinear programmingpipette tip consumption minimization

Identifiers

PMID35540864
PMCPMC9074407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.