Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35540768›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2018

Differences in weathering pattern, stress resistance and community structure of culturable rock-weathering bacteria between altered rocks and soils.

Jun Xi, Meili Wei, Bikui Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jun XiCollege of Life Science, Bengbu Medical College Bengbu 233030 P. R. China xjby2015@126.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1268-4705
Meili WeiCollege of Life Science, Bengbu Medical College Bengbu 233030 P. R. China xjby2015@126.com.
Bikui TangCollege of Life Science, Bengbu Medical College Bengbu 233030 P. R. China xjby2015@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we isolated and characterized rock-weathering bacteria from the surfaces of less and more altered tuffs, along with the adjacent soils, with respect to their rock weathering pattern, stress resistance, community structure, and the changes in these rocks and soils. Using a moderate-nutrition medium, we obtained 150 isolates from the rocks and soils. The rock-weathering patterns of the isolates were characterized using batch cultures that measure the quantity of Si, Al, and Fe released from tuff under aerobic conditions. Based on the potential of the bacterial influence on the element releases, the isolates could be grouped into highly, moderately, and least effective element solubilizers, respectively. Significantly more highly effective Al and Fe solubilizers were observed in the altered rocks, while the soils had more highly effective Si solubilizers. Furthermore, more isolates from the altered rocks significantly acidified the culture medium in the rock weathering process. Dynamic changes in the element release showed the distinct element releasing patterns of three selected isolates. More isolates from the altered rocks could grow at 4 °C or at 55 °C or at pH 4. Some isolates from the altered rocks could grow at pH 10 and with 10-15% (w/v) NaCl. The altered rocks and the soils existed in diverse and different highly weathering-specific culturable rock-weathering community structures. The changes in the culturable weathering communities between the altered rocks and the soils were attributable not only to major bacterial groups but also to a change in the minor population structure.

Identifiers

PMID35540768
PMCPMC9079951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.