Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35540728›Full record

ArticleJB & JS open access

Effect of Abduction Brace Wearing Compliance on the Results of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

Florian Grubhofer, Lukas Ernstbrunner, Christian Gerber, Bettina Hochreiter, Ines Schwihla, Karl Wieser, Samy Bouaicha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Early postoperative functional outcomes and influencing factors in patients with rotator cuff injury].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Traumatic and Atraumatic Rotator Cuff Tears Have the Same Rates of Healing.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  11. Subacromial Balloon Spacer for the Massive Irreparable Cuff Tear.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Florian GrubhoferDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4653-1600
Lukas ErnstbrunnerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4920-8518
Christian GerberDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4624-8285
Bettina HochreiterDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5486-7705
Ines SchwihlaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Karl WieserDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Samy BouaichaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The benefit of protective bracing after rotator cuff reconstruction has been debated for many years, although immobilization compliance has never been assessed objectively to date. In a previous study, compliance with the wearing of an abduction brace was measured for the first time with use of temperature-sensitive sensors. The purpose of the present follow-up study was to assess the effect of immobilization compliance on tendon-healing after rotator cuff repair. Methods: The clinical and radiographic outcomes for 46 consecutive patients with objectively assessed abduction brace wearing compliance after arthroscopic repair of a superior rotator cuff tear were prospectively analyzed. Rotator cuff integrity was examined with ultrasound. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the relative Constant-Murley score (RCS), the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and pain and patient satisfaction ratings. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the optimal cutoff value of abduction brace compliance for discriminating between shoulders that will and will not have a retear and the association of compliance with the failure of rotator cuff repair. Results: After a mean duration of follow-up of 20 ± 9 months, the odds ratio for having a rotator cuff repair failure was 13-fold higher for patients with a compliance rate of <60% (p = 0.037). The retear rate was 3% (1 of 35 patients) in the high-compliance cohort (≥60% compliance) and 27% (3 of 11) in the low-compliance cohort (<60% compliance) (p = 0.037). No differences in RCS, SSV, pain, or postoperative patient satisfaction were observed between patients with ≥60% compliance and those with <60% compliance. Conclusions: Patients with a compliance rate of <60% had a 13-fold increase in the risk of rotator cuff retear. The 2 patients with the lowest compliance rates (11% and 22%) both had retears. Due to the small sample size, no final conclusions can be drawn regarding the influence of immobilization compliance on tendon-healing after rotator cuff repair. These findings justify a prospective trial with a larger cohort to confirm or disprove the value of compliance with abduction bracing. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Identifiers

PMID35540728
PMCPMC9071251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.