Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35540708›Full record

ReviewEuropean urology open science2022

Diagnostic Performance of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Targeted plus Regional Biopsy Approach in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Marinus J Hagens, Mar Fernandez Salamanca, Anwar R Padhani, Pim J van Leeuwen, Henk G van der Poel, Ivo G Schoots

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European urology open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Biopsy strategies in the era of mpMRI: a comprehensive review.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. [Diagnostic efficacy of targeted biopsy combined with regional systematic biopsy in prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 4-5].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marinus J HagensDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mar Fernandez SalamancaDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anwar R PadhaniPaul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.
Pim J van LeeuwenDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk G van der PoelDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ivo G SchootsDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Systematic biopsies are additionally recommended to maximize the diagnostic performance of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnostic pathway for men with suspected prostate cancer (PCa) and positive scans. To reduce unnecessary systematic biopsies (SBx), MRI-directed approaches comprising targeted plus regional biopsy (TBx + RBx) are being investigated. Objective: To systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI-directed TBx + RBx approaches in comparison to MRI-directed TBx alone and TBx + SBx approaches. Evidence acquisition: The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses process. Identified reports were critically appraised according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) criteria. Detection of grade group (GG) ≥2 PCa was the endpoint of interest. Fixed-effect meta-analyses were conducted to characterize summary effect sizes and quantify heterogeneity. Only MRI-positive men were included. Evidence synthesis: A total of eight studies were included for analysis. Among a cumulative total of 2603 men with suspected PCa, the GG ≥2 PCa detection rate did not significantly differ between MRI-directed TBx + RBx and TBx + SBx approaches (risk ratio [RR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-1.01; Conclusions: MRI-directed TBx + RBx approaches showed a nonsignificant difference in detection of GG ≥2 PCa compared to the recommended practice of MRI-directed TBx + SBx. However, owing to the extensive heterogeneity among the studies included, future prospective clinical studies are needed to further investigate, optimize, and standardize this promising biopsy approach. Patient summary: We reviewed the scientific literature on prostate biopsy approaches using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-directed targeted biopsy plus regional biopsy of the prostate. The studies we identified found arguments to potentially embrace such a combined biopsy approach for future diagnostics in prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Diagnostic accuracyProstate biopsyProstate cancerRegional biopsiesSystematic biopsies

Identifiers

PMID35540708
PMCPMC9079161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.