ArticleRSC advances2019
Atomic-level understanding of interface interactions in a halloysite nanotubes-PLA nanocomposite.
Article in RSC advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanism of Cs Immobilization within a Sodalite Framework: The Role of Alkaline Cations and the Si/Al Ratio.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Natural and Synthetic Clay Minerals in the Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Fields.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Properties of Poplar Fiber/PLA Composites: Comparison on the Effect of Maleic Anhydride and KH550 Modification of Poplar Fiber.Polymers · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To understand the nature of the bonding mechanism between poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and halloysite nanotubes (HNT), a first-principles DFT study was performed on the adsorption behavior of the PLA monomer, lactic acid (LA), on the outer, inner, and edge surfaces of the HNT. The role of LA functional groups, and its orientation behavior in the formation of bonds with HNT are systematically studied. Analysis of the adsorption energy, total and partial electron density of states (DOS), electric charge transfer between LA atoms and HNT mineral surfaces shows that van der Waals attraction governs their interaction. The calculations of the most stable adsorption configurations of LA show that the predominant number of hydrogen bonds is determined by the activity of the carboxyl functional group of LA on the hydroxylated surfaces of HNT. The important role of the -OH surface groups in the mechanism of lactic acid binding has been established; their absence on the external siloxane surface significantly reduces the LA affinity for HNT. The binding energy of lactic acid on the hydroxylated internal and edge surfaces of the HNT is much higher (by about 275%) than on the external siloxane surface. Mulliken population analysis showed that the formation of a hydrogen bond with the LA atomic groups leads to a more significant redistribution of charge on the inner and edge surfaces of the HNT in comparison with its outer surface. Van der Waals attraction between the LA and HNTs, as well as hydrogen bonds, is responsible for the formation of the bonding mechanism in halloysite nanotubes-PLA nanocomposite. Our results are in accord with available literature.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.