ArticleRSC advances2019
Effect of different-sizes of hydroxyapatite on the water resistance of magnesium oxychloride cement for bone repair.
Article in RSC advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research on Deterioration Behavior of Magnesium Oxychloride Cement Under High Humidity and High Temperature.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Effect of Liquid Phase Concentration on the Setting Time and Compressive Strength of Hydroxyapatite/Bioglass Composite Cement.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnesium oxychloride cement (MOC) has recently attracted significant attention due to its excellent mechanical properties and biological behavior. However, the applications of MOC have been limited by its poor water resistance. To solve this problem, micro-sized hydroxyapatite (μ-HA) and nano-sized hydroxyapatite (n-HA) were used to improve the water resistance of MOC. The microstructure, mechanical strength and tissue responses of three types of MOC were investigated. The results demonstrated that the lost strength of MOC-0, MOC/μ-HA and MOC/n-HA were 0.92 ± 0.04, 0.81 ± 0.02 and 0.55 ± 0.01 after immersing in SBF for 28 days. The contact angles of MOC-0, MOC/μ-HA and MOC/n-HA were 42.5 ± 4.76°, 50.3 ± 5.63° and 70.4 ± 6.59°, respectively. Compared to MOC-0 and MOC/μ-HA, the filling role of the n-HA in the cement was more favorable for the formation of 5 Mg(OH)
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.