Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35539721›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2018

Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using layered double hydroxide derived adsorbents, a critical review.

Junya Wang, Taiping Zhang, Min Li, Ying Yang, Peng Lu, Ping Ning, Qiang Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. LDH-TiONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Enhanced arsenate removal from aqueous solution by Mn-doped MgAl-layered double hydroxides.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Junya WangFaculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology Kunming 650500 Yunnan P. R. China 1456149879@qq.com +86 13708409187.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9546-1464
Taiping ZhangFaculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology Kunming 650500 Yunnan P. R. China 1456149879@qq.com +86 13708409187.
Min LiFaculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology Kunming 650500 Yunnan P. R. China 1456149879@qq.com +86 13708409187.
Ying YangFaculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology Kunming 650500 Yunnan P. R. China 1456149879@qq.com +86 13708409187.
Peng LuSchool of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Ningbo University Ningbo 315211 Zhejing P. R. China.
Ping NingFaculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology Kunming 650500 Yunnan P. R. China 1456149879@qq.com +86 13708409187.
Qiang WangCollege of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Forestry University 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District Beijing 100083 P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2719-2762
Kunming University of Science and Technology · CNBeijing Forestry University · CNNingbo University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arsenic pollution has become a worldwide environmental concern. Dangerous arsenic concentrations in natural waters threaten the health of millions of people, and this has received significant attention. Among the various technologies that have been developed for arsenic removal from water, the use of adsorption technology is considered to be a prevailing method, because the adsorption approach usually has high removal efficiency and the advantage of convenience of handling. In recent years, layered double hydroxides (LDHs) have become prime candidates for arsenic removal, due to their hydrophilic nature and cationic layered structures. Research on arsenic removal using LDHs is mainly focused on (1) the influence of the synthesis method and composition of the LDH, (2) the influence of the particle size of the LDH, (3) the influence of the Mg/Al ratio in LDHs, (4) LDH-based hybrids and (5) the competition with other anions. This paper provides a review of the currently available literature focusing on arsenic removal using LDHs for the five parts mentioned above. In addition, based on this overview, a closing section will suggest research efforts for future work. It is expected that this review will provide a summary of the main research in this area, and will also shed light on the direction of future development.

Identifiers

PMID35539721
PMCPMC9081627
OpenAlexW2808752005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.