ArticleRSC advances2018
The formulation and characterization of 3D printed grafts as vascular access for potential use in hemodialysis.
Article in RSC advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimization of FDM 3D printing process parameters to produce haemodialysis curcumin-loaded vascular grafts.Drug delivery and translational research · 2023Article
- From arteries to capillaries: approaches to engineering human vasculature.Advanced functional materials · 2020Article
- Freeform 3D printing of vascularized tissues: Challenges and strategies.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arteriovenous graft (AVG) failure continues to be a life-threatening problem in haemodialysis. Graft failure can occur if the implanted graft is not well-matched to the vasculature of the patient. Likewise, stenosis often develops at the vein-graft anastomosis, contributing to thrombosis and early graft failure. To address this clinical need, a novel ink formulation comprised of ACMO/TMPTA/TMETA for 3D printing a AVG was developed (ACMO-AVG), in which the printed AVG was biocompatible and did not induce cytotoxicity. The ease of customizing the ACMO-AVG according to different requirements was demonstrated. Furthermore, the AVG displayed similar mechanical properties to the commercially available arteriovenous ePTFE graft (ePTFE-AVG). Unlike ePTFE-AVG, the ACMO-AVG displayed excellent anti-fouling characteristics because no plasma protein adsorption and platelet adhesion were detected on the luminal surfaces after 2 h of incubation. Similarly, exposure to human endothelial cells and human vascular smooth muscle cells did not result in any cell detection on the surfaces of the ACMO-AVG. Thus, the present study demonstrates a newly developed 3D printing ink formulation that can be successfully 3D printed into a clinically applicable vascular access used for haemodialysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.