Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35539443›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiology2022

Artificial Intelligence Enabled Fully Automated CMR Function Quantification for Optimized Risk Stratification in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Ruben Evertz, Torben Lange, Sören J Backhaus, Alexander Schulz, Bo Eric Beuthner, Rodi Topci, Karl Toischer, Miriam Puls, Johannes T Kowallick, Gerd Hasenfuß and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Innovation in Interventional Cardiovascular Care.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ruben EvertzUniversity Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5904-4652
Torben LangeUniversity Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0505-2582
Sören J BackhausUniversity Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2683-6418
Alexander SchulzUniversity Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Göttingen, Germany.
Bo Eric BeuthnerUniversity Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Göttingen, Germany.
Rodi TopciUniversity Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6659-0336
Karl ToischerUniversity Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Göttingen, Germany.
Miriam PulsUniversity Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Göttingen, Germany.
Johannes T KowallickGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Gerd HasenfußUniversity Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Göttingen, Germany.
Andreas SchusterUniversity Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1508-1125

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is considered the reference standard for assessing cardiac morphology and function and has demonstrated prognostic utility in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Novel fully automated analyses may facilitate data analyses but have not yet been compared against conventional manual data acquisition in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Methods: Fully automated and manual biventricular assessments were performed in 139 AS patients scheduled for TAVR using commercially available software (suiteHEART®, Neosoft; QMass®, Medis Medical Imaging Systems). Volumetric assessment included left ventricular (LV) mass, LV/right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic/end-systolic volume, LV/RV stroke volume, and LV/RV ejection fraction (EF). Results of fully automated and manual analyses were compared. Regression analyses and receiver operator characteristics including area under the curve (AUC) calculation for prediction of the primary study endpoint cardiovascular (CV) death were performed. Results: Fully automated and manual assessment of LVEF revealed similar prediction of CV mortality in univariable (manual: hazard ratio (HR) 0.970 (95% CI 0.943-0.997) Conclusion: Fully automated biventricular volumetric assessments enable efficient and equal risk prediction compared to conventional manual approaches. In addition to significant time saving, this may provide the tools for optimized clinical management and stratification of patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAortic ValveArtificial IntelligenceHumansRisk AssessmentStroke VolumeVentricular Function, Left

Identifiers

PMID35539443
PMCPMC9046000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.