Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35539430›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine2022

β-Blocker Use and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review.

Abhinav Tella, William Vang, Eustacia Ikeri, Olivia Taylor, Alicia Zhang, Megan Mazanec, Srihari Raju, Areef Ishani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Current Knowledge of Beta-Blockers in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abhinav TellaDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Minneapolis Veterans Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN.
William VangDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Minneapolis Veterans Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN.
Eustacia IkeriDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Minneapolis Veterans Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN.
Olivia TaylorDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Minneapolis Veterans Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN.
Alicia ZhangDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Minneapolis Veterans Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN.
Megan MazanecDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Minneapolis Veterans Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN.
Srihari RajuDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Minneapolis Veterans Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN.
Areef IshaniDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Minneapolis Veterans Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN.
Minneapolis VA Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale & Objective: There is conflicting evidence regarding the type of β-blockers to use in dialysis patients. This systematic review seeks to determine whether highly dialyzable β-blockers are associated with higher rates of cardiovascular events and mortality in hemodialysis patients than poorly dialyzable β-blockers. Study Design: A systematic review of the existing literature was conducted. A meta-analysis was performed using data from the selected studies. Setting & Study Populations: Participants were from the United States, Canada, and Taiwan. The mean ages of participants ranged from 55.9-75.7 years. Selection Criteria for Studies: We searched the Ovid MEDLINE database from 1990 to September 2020. Studies without adult hemodialysis participants and without comparisons of at least 2 β-blockers of different dialyzability were excluded. Data Extraction: Baseline and adjusted outcome data were extracted from each study. Analytical Approach: Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios using fully adjusted models from individual studies. Results: Four cohort studies were included. Pooling fully adjusted models, highly dialyzable β-blockers did not influence mortality (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81-1.08; I Limitations: No randomized controlled trials were identified. Each study used different analytic methods and different definitions for outcomes. Classifications of β-blockers varied. Only 1 study reported on adverse events. Conclusions: Pooled data suggest highly dialyzable β-blockers are associated with similar mortality events and fewer cardiovascular events compared with poorly dialyzable β-blockers.

Indexed as

Acebutololadrenergic beta-antagonistsatenololbeta blockersbisoprololcarvedilolhemodialysislabetalolmetoprololpropranololrenal dialysisβ-blockers

Identifiers

PMID35539430
PMCPMC9079357
OpenAlexW4220687387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.