Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35539386›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2018

A machine learning approach towards the prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity based on fundamental molecular properties.

Indra Kundu, Goutam Paul, Raja Banerjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Beyond sequence: Structure-based machine learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Learning to discover medicines.International journal of data science and analytics · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Green chemistry and coronavirus.Sustainable chemistry and pharmacy · 2021
    Review
  16. Deep Learning in Virtual Screening: Recent Applications and Developments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Are 2D fingerprints still valuable for drug discovery?Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Indra KunduDepartment of Bioinformatics, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology (formerly known as West Bengal University of Technology) Kolkata India indraknd@gmail.com.
Goutam PaulIndian Statistical Institute Kolkata India goutam.k.paul@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5160-6032
Raja BanerjeeMaulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology (formerly known as West Bengal University of Technology) Kolkata India banraja10@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1890-6401

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an exigency of transformation of the enormous amount of biological data available in various forms into some significant knowledge. We have tried to implement Machine Learning (ML) algorithm models on the protein-ligand binding affinity data already available to predict the binding affinity of the unknown. ML methods are appreciably faster and cheaper as compared to traditional experimental methods or computational scoring approaches. The prerequisites of this prediction are sufficient and unbiased features of training data and a prediction model which can fit the data well. In our study, we have applied Random forest and Gaussian process regression algorithms from the Weka package on protein-ligand binding affinity, which encompasses protein and ligand binding information from PdbBind database. The models are trained on the basis of selective fundamental information of both proteins and ligand, which can be effortlessly fetched from online databases or can be calculated with the availability of structure. The assessment of the models was made on the basis of correlation coefficient (

Identifiers

PMID35539386
PMCPMC9079328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.