Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35539295›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022

Surgical Treatment Outcome of de Quervain's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Romy Bosman, Liron S Duraku, Mark J W van der Oest, C A Hundepool, Vaikunthan Rajaratnam, D M Power, Ruud W Selles, J Michiel Zuidam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Romy BosmanDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Liron S DurakuDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mark J W van der OestDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
C A HundepoolDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Vaikunthan RajaratnamDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore.
D M PowerQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom.
Ruud W SellesDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
J Michiel ZuidamDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLKhoo Teck Puat Hospital · SGQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Surgical release of the extensor retinaculum is performed as a treatment for de Quervain's (DQ) disease when conservative treatment fails. In the literature, there is no consensus about the effectiveness of a surgical release in patients with DQ, the complication rate, or which type of incision is superior. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Methods: A systematic search was performed in Embase, Medline Ovid, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. Articles regarding surgical treatment of DQ disease that reported outcome and complications were included. We extracted exact values of visual analog scale scores and percentages of patients who experienced pain at follow-up. Complications assessed were (sub) luxation, superficial radial nerve injuries, wound infections, and scar problems. Results: Twenty-one studies with a total of 939 patients were included. Five percent of these patients (95% CI 1%-18%) did not show complete remission of pain at follow-up. When pooled, the mean reduction in visual analog scale scores was 5.7 (95% CI 5.3-6.1) on a 0-10 scale. No difference in outcome between different types of surgery or incisions was seen. Based on the meta-analysis, the pooled complication rate was 11% (95% CI 5%-22%). Conclusions: Five percent of patients still have residual pain after surgical release of the first extensor compartment. Surgery type, as well as the type of incision, did not affect outcome or complication. Thus, surgical release of the extensor retinaculum for DQ disease is an effective treatment, regardless of the type of surgery.

Identifiers

PMID35539295
PMCPMC9076451
OpenAlexW4229004882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.