Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35539285›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2022

Impact of physical activity on COVID-19-related symptoms and perception of physical performance, fatigue and exhaustion during stay-at-home orders.

Andreas Gehlhar, Nikola Schmidt, Nina Eisenburger, Sven Feddern, Annelene Kossow, Johannes Nießen, Stefanie Wessely, Gerhard A Wiesmüller, Barbara Grüne, Christine Joisten and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas GehlharInstitute for Occupational Medicine and Social Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2892-3363
Nikola SchmidtDepartment for Physical Activity in Public Health, German Sport University Institute of Movement and Neurosciences, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8739-8354
Nina EisenburgerDepartment for Physical Activity in Public Health, German Sport University Institute of Movement and Neurosciences, Cologne, Germany.
Sven FeddernInfektions- und Umwelthygiene, Cologne Health Department, Cologne, Germany.
Annelene KossowInfektions- und Umwelthygiene, Cologne Health Department, Cologne, Germany.
Johannes NießenInfektions- und Umwelthygiene, Cologne Health Department, Cologne, Germany.
Stefanie WesselyDepartment for Physical Activity in Public Health, German Sport University Institute of Movement and Neurosciences, Cologne, Germany.
Gerhard A WiesmüllerInstitute for Occupational Medicine and Social Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Barbara GrüneInfektions- und Umwelthygiene, Cologne Health Department, Cologne, Germany.
Christine JoistenInfektions- und Umwelthygiene, Cologne Health Department, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2455-8901
CoCo-Fakt Group
German Sport University Cologne · DERWTH Aachen University · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The measures used to contain the COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant reduction in physical activity. Due to the health benefits of exercise, recommendations were made for lockdown restrictions. Within the CoCo-Fakt study (Cologne-Corona counselling and support for index and contacts during the quarantine period), we aimed to determine how these recommendations were implemented, especially by individuals who were officially quarantined due to an infected persons (IPs) or as close contacts (CPs), and how this affected their physical and psychological condition. Methods: From 12 December 2020 to 6 January 2021, all IPs and CPs registered by Cologne's public health department up to the survey period were surveyed online. Of 10 547 people in the CoCo-Fakt sample, 8102 were integrated into the current analysis. In addition to demographic data, information regarding COVID-19-specific and persistent symptoms or conditions and their association with the amount and type of exercise and screen time before and during the quarantine were collected. Results: Before quarantine, 66.9% of IPs and 69% of CPs were physically active; during quarantine, this decreased by 49.4% in IPs depending on the course of the disease and by 30.6% in CPs. Physically active IPs and CPs felt less exhausted and more fit during their quarantine periods than those who were inactive, with active IPs significantly less likely to report prolonged physical and psychological symptoms than their more sedentary counterparts. Conclusion: Given the acute and long-term positive effects of exercise on quarantined individuals, corresponding recommendations should be communicated to those affected, especially CPs. Recommendations for IPs depend on their health status.

Indexed as

COVID-19ExerciseInfection

Identifiers

PMID35539285
PMCPMC9072782
OpenAlexW4225390939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.