Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35539187›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2018

Tea saponins: effective natural surfactants beneficial for soil remediation, from preparation to application.

Xiao-Lan Yu, Yong He

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Terpenoids fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Green Tea: Current Knowledge and Issues.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Applications of ChineseFrontiers in chemistry · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiao-Lan YuCollege of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University Hangzhou P. R. China yhe@zju.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1780-7850
Yong HeCollege of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University Hangzhou P. R. China yhe@zju.edu.cn.
Hangzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tea saponins, found in

Identifiers

PMID35539187
PMCPMC9082184
OpenAlexW2809693132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.