Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35538775›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

Large-herbivore nemabiomes: patterns of parasite diversity and sharing.

Georgia C Titcomb, Johan Pansu, Matthew C Hutchinson, Kaia J Tombak, Christina B Hansen, Christopher C M Baker, Tyler R Kartzinel, Hillary S Young, Robert M Pringle

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Silent predators: Revealing the parasites of Himalayan musk deer (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Georgia C TitcombDepartment of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2206-1125
Johan PansuDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0256-0258
Matthew C HutchinsonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2423-4026
Kaia J TombakMpala Research Centre, Nanyuki, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-7339-742X
Christina B HansenDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Christopher C M BakerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2675-1078
Tyler R KartzinelDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8488-0580
Hillary S YoungDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0449-8582
Robert M PringleDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7487-5393
Princeton University · USUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCity University of New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amidst global shifts in the distribution and abundance of wildlife and livestock, we have only a rudimentary understanding of ungulate parasite communities and parasite-sharing patterns. We used qPCR and DNA metabarcoding of fecal samples to characterize gastrointestinal nematode (Strongylida) community composition and sharing among 17 sympatric species of wild and domestic large mammalian herbivore in central Kenya. We tested a suite of hypothesis-driven predictions about the role of host traits and phylogenetic relatedness in describing parasite infections. Host species identity explained 27-53% of individual variation in parasite prevalence, richness, community composition and phylogenetic diversity. Host and parasite phylogenies were congruent, host gut morphology predicted parasite community composition and prevalence, and hosts with low evolutionary distinctiveness were centrally positioned in the parasite-sharing network. We found no evidence that host body size, social-group size or feeding height were correlated with parasite composition. Our results highlight the interwoven evolutionary and ecological histories of large herbivores and their gastrointestinal nematodes and suggest that host identity, phylogeny and gut architecture-a phylogenetically conserved trait related to parasite habitat-are the overriding influences on parasite communities. These findings have implications for wildlife management and conservation as wild herbivores are increasingly replaced by livestock.

Indexed as

NematodaParasitesAnimalsAnimals, WildHerbivoryHost-Parasite InteractionsLivestockMammalsPhylogenycophylogenyecological network analysisgeneralism and specialismmultiparasitismphylosymbiosiswildlife–livestock interface

Identifiers

PMID35538775
PMCPMC9091847
OpenAlexW4280567870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.