Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35538748›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2022

Standardized Versus Tailored Implementation of Measurement-Based Care for Depression in Community Mental Health Clinics.

Cara C Lewis, C Nathan Marti, Kelli Scott, Madison R Walker, Meredith Boyd, Ajeng Puspitasari, Peter Mendel, Kurt Kroenke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cara C LewisKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle (Lewis); Abacist Analytics, Austin, Texas (Marti); Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (Scott); School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Walker); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Boyd); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Puspitasari); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Mendel); Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington (Kroenke).
C Nathan MartiKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle (Lewis); Abacist Analytics, Austin, Texas (Marti); Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (Scott); School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Walker); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Boyd); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Puspitasari); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Mendel); Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington (Kroenke).
Kelli ScottKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle (Lewis); Abacist Analytics, Austin, Texas (Marti); Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (Scott); School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Walker); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Boyd); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Puspitasari); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Mendel); Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington (Kroenke).
Madison R WalkerKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle (Lewis); Abacist Analytics, Austin, Texas (Marti); Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (Scott); School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Walker); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Boyd); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Puspitasari); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Mendel); Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington (Kroenke).
Meredith BoydKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle (Lewis); Abacist Analytics, Austin, Texas (Marti); Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (Scott); School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Walker); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Boyd); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Puspitasari); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Mendel); Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington (Kroenke).
Ajeng PuspitasariKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle (Lewis); Abacist Analytics, Austin, Texas (Marti); Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (Scott); School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Walker); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Boyd); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Puspitasari); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Mendel); Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington (Kroenke).
Peter MendelKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle (Lewis); Abacist Analytics, Austin, Texas (Marti); Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (Scott); School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Walker); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Boyd); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Puspitasari); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Mendel); Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington (Kroenke).
Kurt KroenkeKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle (Lewis); Abacist Analytics, Austin, Texas (Marti); Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (Scott); School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Walker); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Boyd); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Puspitasari); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Mendel); Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington (Kroenke).

Funding

ALCOHOL INTERVENTION/TREATMENT OUTCOME RESEARCH TRAININGT32AA007459 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERT MIRANDA, PETER M. MONTI · 1986 to 2026
$13.3M
Standardized versus Tailored Implementation of Measurement Based Care for DepressionR01MH103310 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI LEWIS, CARA CHARISSA · 2014 to 2017
$2.0M
Pilot Implementation of Measurement-Based Care in Community Opioid Treatment ProgramsK23DA050729 · NIDA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SCOTT, KELLI · 2021 to 2025
$946k
Identifying the Mechanisms of Change in Measurement Based Care for DepressionF31MH111134 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI SCOTT, KELLI · 2016 to 2016
$40k
NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007459NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA050729NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH111134NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH103310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Measurement-based care (MBC) is an evidence-based practice that is rarely integrated into psychotherapy. The authors sought to determine whether tailored MBC implementation can improve clinician fidelity and depression outcomes compared with standardized implementation. Methods: This cluster-randomized trial enrolled 12 community behavioral health clinics to receive 5 months of implementation support. Clinics randomized to the standardized implementation received electronic health record data captured with the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a needs assessment, clinical training, guidelines, and group consultation in MBC fidelity. Tailored implementation support included these strategies, but the training content was tailored to clinics’ barriers to MBC, and group consultation centered on overcoming these barriers. Clinicians (N=83, tailored; N=71, standardized) delivering individual psychotherapy to 4,025 adults participated. Adult patients (N=87, tailored; N=141, standardized) contributed data for depression outcome analyses. Results: The odds of PHQ-9 completion were lower in the tailored group at baseline (odds ratio [OR]=0.28, 95% CI=0.08–0.96) but greater at 5 months (OR=3.39, 95% CI=1.00–11.48). The two implementation groups did not differ in full MBC fidelity. PHQ-9 scores decreased significantly from baseline (mean±SD=17.6±4.4) to 12 weeks (mean=12.6±5.9) (p<0.001), but neither implementation group nor MBC fidelity significantly predicted PHQ-9 scores at week 12. Conclusions: Tailored MBC implementation outperformed standardized implementation with respect to PHQ-9 completion, but discussion of PHQ-9 scores in clinician-patient sessions remained suboptimal. MBC fidelity did not predict week-12 depression severity. MBC can critically inform collaborative adjustments to session or treatment plans, but more strategic system-level implementation support or longer implementation periods may be needed.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesMental Health ServicesDepressionHumansMental HealthPsychotherapyCommunity mental health centersDepressionEvidence based practiceHybrid trialImplementationMeasurement based care

Identifiers

PMID35538748
PMCPMC9529853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.