Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35538598›Full record

ArticleNursing inquiry2023

How digital health documentation transforms professional practices in primary healthcare in Denmark: A WPR document analysis.

Julie Duval Jensen, Loni Ledderer, Kirsten Beedholm

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing inquiry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie Duval JensenDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0509-5411
Loni LeddererDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2685-4579
Kirsten BeedholmDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5952-9062
Aarhus University · DK

Funding

Aarhus UniversitetHelsefondenMunicipality of SyddjursSundhedskartellet/KL
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, recordkeeping has been an essential task for health professionals. Today, this mandatory task increasingly takes place as digital documentation. This study critically examines problem constructions in practical documents on digital documentation strategies in Danish municipal healthcare and how these problem constructions imply particular solutions. A document analysis based on the approach presented in Bacchi's "What's the problem represented to be?" was applied. Forty practical documents in the form of guidelines, strategies, and quality control documents were included. The analysis uncovered three problem representations: lack of coherence between health services in a complex healthcare system, lack of assessable data for management and political prioritization, and inefficiency in the healthcare system. The proposed solution is a digitalized and standardized practice that transforms recordkeeping in the municipalities. However, municipal healthcare is at risk of being fragmented due to digital documentation's focus on the organizational management of health with task-oriented practices supplied by an anonymous health professional. We find that digital documentation functions as an organizational micromanagement approach that assigns the health professional a subject position as an employee acting according to the organization's framework rather than the profession's normative framework.

Indexed as

Document AnalysisDocumentationDenmarkHumansPrimary Health CareProfessional Practicedigitaldocument analysisdocumentationEHRpracticeprimary healthcareproblem representationWPR

Identifiers

PMID35538598
PMCPMC10078429
OpenAlexW4280534071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.