Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35538563›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2022

A total infectome approach to understand the etiology of infectious disease in pigs.

Xinyi Huang, Weichen Wu, Xiaoxiao Tian, Xin Hou, Xingyang Cui, Yihong Xiao, Qiulin Jiao, Pei Zhou, Liqiang Liu, Weilin Shi and 10 more

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Development of Highly Efficient UniversalJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. Natural co-infection of pigs with African swine fever virus and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in India.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Meta-Analysis and Systematic Literature Review of the GenusJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Xinyi Huang *State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Weichen Wu *School of Medicine, Shenzhen campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaoxiao TianState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Xin HouSchool of Medicine, Shenzhen campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Xingyang CuiState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Yihong XiaoCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China.
Qiulin JiaoCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China.
Pei ZhouCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Liqiang LiuCollege of Life Sciences and Food Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, China.
Weilin ShiHarbin Weike Biotechnology Development Company, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Ligong ChenCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, China.
Yue SunState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Yongbo YangState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Jianxin ChenCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Guihong ZhangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Jinling LiuCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.
Edward C HolmesSydney Institute for Infectious Diseases, School of Life & Environmental Sciences and School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Xuehui CaiState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Tongqing AnState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China. antongqing@caas.cn.
Mang ShiSchool of Medicine, Shenzhen campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China. shim23@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe global pork industry is continuously affected by infectious diseases that can result in large-scale mortality, trade restrictions, and major reductions in production. Nevertheless, the cause of many infectious diseases in pigs remains unclear, largely because commonly used diagnostic tools fail to capture the full diversity of potential pathogens and because pathogen co-infection is common.

resultsWe used a meta-transcriptomic approach to systematically characterize the pathogens in 136 clinical cases representing different disease syndromes in pigs, as well as in 12 non-diseased controls. This enabled us to simultaneously determine the diversity, abundance, genomic information, and detailed epidemiological history of a wide range of potential pathogens. We identified 34 species of RNA viruses, nine species of DNA viruses, seven species of bacteria, and three species of fungi, including two novel divergent members of the genus Pneumocystis. While most of these pathogens were only apparent in diseased animals or were at higher abundance in diseased animals than in healthy animals, others were present in healthy controls, suggesting opportunistic infections. Importantly, most of the cases examined here were characterized by co-infection with more than two species of viral, bacterial, or fungal pathogens, some with highly correlated occurrence and abundance levels. Examination of clinical signs and necropsy results in the context of relevant pathogens revealed that a multiple-pathogen model was better associated with the data than a single-pathogen model was.

conclusionsOur data demonstrate that most of the pig diseases examined were better explained by the presence of multiple rather than single pathogens and that infection with one pathogen can facilitate infection or increase the prevalence/abundance of another. Consequently, it is generally preferable to consider the cause of a disease based on a panel of co-infecting pathogens rather than on individual infectious agents. Video abstract.

Indexed as

CoinfectionCommunicable DiseasesRNA VirusesAnimalsBacteriaDNA VirusesSwineAnimal diseaseInfectomeMeta-transcriptomicsPathogens

Identifiers

PMID35538563
PMCPMC9086151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.