ArticleBMC medicine2022
Association between circulating vitamin E and ten common cancers: evidence from large-scale Mendelian randomization analysis and a longitudinal cohort study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unraveling the Controversy: The Causal Link Between Osteoarthritis and Alzheimer's Disease.Brain and behavior · 2025Pooled it
- Review of Mendelian randomization studies on common male-specific diseases.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Risk factors for prostate cancer: An umbrella review of prospective observational studies and mendelian randomization analyses.PLoS medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Risk assessment for colorectal cancer via polygenic risk score and lifestyle exposure: a large-scale association study of East Asian and European populations.Genome medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Investigating Causal Associations of Circulating Micronutrients Concentrations with the Risk of Lung Cancer: A Mendelian Randomization Study.Nutrients · 2022Pooled it
- Article
- Identification of mitochondrial dynamics-related biomarkers in psoriasis using bioinformatics and Mendelian randomization.Medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring Vitamin E's Role in Colorectal Cancer Growth Using Rodent Models: A Scoping Review.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Oxidative stress in cancer: from tumor and microenvironment remodeling to therapeutic frontiers.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Dietary Pattern of Garlic and Risk of Chronic Diseases: Evidence From Three Large-Scale Cohorts.Health care science · 2025Article
- Genetically proxied risk and protective factors for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian randomization studies.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- A genome-wide cross-trait analysis characterizes the shared genetic architecture between lung and gastrointestinal diseases.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Bidirectional Mendelian randomization and mediation analysis of million-scale data reveal causal relationships between thyroid-related phenotypes, smoking, and lung cancer.Journal of biomedical research · 2025Article
- Exploring the silent connection: unveiling the intricate relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and sleep apnea syndrome.Human genomics · 2025Article
- Bee Pollen Potential to Modulate Ferroptosis: Phytochemical Insights for Age-Related Diseases.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Vitamin E (α-Tocopherol): Emerging Clinical Role and Adverse Risks of Supplementation in Adults.Cureus · 2025Review
- Associations of cathepsins with pulmonary arterial hypertension mediated by circulating metabolites: A Mendelian randomization study.Medicine · 2025Article
- Observational
- Biochemical mechanisms and molecular interactions of vitamins in cancer therapy.Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2025Review
- SUMMER: A Practical Tool for Identifying Factors and Biomarkers Associated with Pan-cancer Survival.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe association between vitamin E and cancer risk has been widely investigated by observational studies, but the findings remain inconclusive. Here, we aimed to evaluate the causal effect of circulating vitamin E on the risk of ten common cancers, including bladder, breast, colorectal, esophagus, lung, oral and pharynx, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, and kidney cancer.
methodsA Mendelian randomization (MR) analytic framework was applied to data from a cancer-specific genome-wide association study (GWAS) comprising a total of 297,699 cancer cases and 304,736 controls of European ancestry. Three genetic instrumental variables associated with circulating vitamin E were selected. Summary statistic-based methods of inverse variance weighting (IVW) and likelihood-based approach, as well as the individual genotyping-based method of genetic risk score (GRS) were used. Multivariable IVW analysis was further performed to control for potential confounding effects. Furthermore, the UK Biobank cohort was used as external validation, supporting 355,543 European participants (incident cases ranged from 437 for ovarian cancer to 4882 for prostate cancer) for GRS-based estimation of circulating vitamin E, accompanied by a one-sample MR analysis of dietary vitamin E intake underlying the time-to-event analytic framework.
resultsSpecific to cancer GWAS, we found that circulating vitamin E was significantly associated with increased bladder cancer risk (odds ratios [OR]
conclusionsThis large-scale population study upon data from cancer-specific GWAS and a longitudinal biobank cohort indicates plausible non-causal associations between circulating vitamin E and ten common cancers in the European populations. Further studies regarding ancestral diversity are warranted to validate such causal associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.