Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35538450›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Isolation, marginalisation and disempowerment - understanding how interactions with health providers can influence smoking cessation in pregnancy.

Cherise Fletcher, Elizabeth Hoon, Angela Gialamas, Gustaaf Dekker, John Lynch, Lisa Smithers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cherise FletcherSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Level 5, 50 Rundle Mall, Rundle Mall Plaza, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Elizabeth HoonSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Level 5, 50 Rundle Mall, Rundle Mall Plaza, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Angela GialamasSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Level 5, 50 Rundle Mall, Rundle Mall Plaza, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Gustaaf DekkerThe Robinson Research Institute, Norwich Centre, Ground Floor, 55 King William Road, North Adelaide, SA, 5006, Australia.
John LynchSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Level 5, 50 Rundle Mall, Rundle Mall Plaza, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Lisa SmithersSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Level 5, 50 Rundle Mall, Rundle Mall Plaza, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia. lisa.smithers@adelaide.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal smoking during pregnancy can lead to serious adverse health outcomes for both women and their infants. While smoking in pregnancy has declined over time, it remains consistently higher in women with lower socioeconomic circumstances. Furthermore, fewer women in this group will successfully quit during pregnancy.

aimThis study explores the barriers to smoking cessation experienced by socially disadvantaged pregnant women and investigates how interactions with health providers can influence their smoking cessation journey.

methodsWomen (either pregnant or birthed in the previous 10 years, who smoked or quit smoking in pregnancy) were recruited from a metropolitan public hospital antenatal clinic in South Australia and community organisations in surrounding suburbs. Seventeen women participated in qualitative semi-structured small focus groups or interviews. The focus groups and interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed.

findingsFour interconnected themes were identified: 1) smoking embedded in women's challenging lives and pregnancies, 2) cyclic isolation and marginalisation, 3) feeling disempowered, and 4) autonomy and self-determination. Themes 3 and 4 are characterised as being two sides of a single coin in that they coexist simultaneously and are inseparable. A key finding is a strong unanimous desire for smoking cessation in pregnancy but women felt they did not have the necessary support from health providers or confidence and self-efficacy to be successful.

conclusionWomen would like improvements to antenatal care that increase health practitioners' understanding of the social and contextual healthcare barriers faced by women who smoke in pregnancy. They seek improved interventions from health providers to make informed choices about smoking cessation and would like women-centred care. Women feel that with greater support, more options for cessation strategies and consistency and encouragement from health providers they could be more successful at antenatal smoking cessation. If such changes were made, then South Australian practice could align more with best practice international guidelines for addressing smoking cessation in pregnancy, and potentially improve outcomes for women and their children.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationAustraliaChildDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareDisadvantagePregnancySmoking cessationSocioeconomic positionTobacco smoking

Identifiers

PMID35538450
PMCPMC9086664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.