Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35538268›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2022

Patient perspectives on window of opportunity clinical trials in early-stage breast cancer.

Divya A Parikh, Lisa Kody, Susie Brain, Diane Heditsian, Vivian Lee, Christina Curtis, Mardi R Karin, Irene L Wapnir, Manali I Patel, George W Sledge and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Divya A ParikhDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. divyaa@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7432-4601
Lisa KodyStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Susie BrainDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Diane HeditsianDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Vivian LeeDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Christina CurtisDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Mardi R KarinDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Irene L WapnirDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Manali I PatelDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
George W Sledge *Department of Medicine, Stanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Jennifer L Caswell-Jin *Department of Medicine, Stanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Stanford Medicine · USStanford University · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

AHRQ HHS T32 HS026128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWindow of opportunity trials (WOT) are increasingly common in oncology research. In WOT participants receive a drug between diagnosis and anti-cancer treatment, usually for the purpose of investigating that drugs effect on cancer biology. This qualitative study aimed to understand patient perspectives on WOT.

methodsWe recruited adults diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer awaiting definitive therapy at a single-academic medical center to participate in semi-structured interviews. Thematic and content analyses were performed to identify attitudes and factors that would influence decisions about WOT participation.

resultsWe interviewed 25 women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. The most common positive attitudes toward trial participation were a desire to contribute to research and a hope for personal benefit, while the most common concerns were the potential for side effects and how they might impact fitness for planned treatment. Participants indicated family would be an important normative factor in decision-making and, during the COVID-19 pandemic, deemed the absence of family members during clinic visits a barrier to enrollment. Factors that could hinder participation included delay in standard treatment and the requirement for additional visits or procedures. Ultimately, most interviewees stated they would participate in a WOT if offered (N = 17/25).

conclusionIn this qualitative study, interviewees weighed altruism and hypothetical personal benefit against the possibility of side effect from a WOT. In-person family presence during trial discussion, challenging during COVID-19, was important for many. Our results may inform trial design and communication approaches in future window of opportunity efforts.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCOVID-19AdultClinical Trials as TopicCommunicationFemaleHumansPandemicsQualitative ResearchBreast cancerClinical trialsPatient perspectivesWindow of opportunity

Identifiers

PMID35538268
PMCPMC9090598
OpenAlexW4280521876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.