Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35538240›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2022

Dietary inclusion of restaurant food waste effects on nutrient digestibility, milk yield and its composition, blood metabolites of lactating Zaraibi goats, and their offspring performance.

Ahmed M Hussein, Hanan A M Hassanien, Magdy H Abou El-Fadel, Youssef L Phillip, Mohamed M El-Badawy, Heba A El-Sanafawy, Amany A Khayyal, Abdelfattah Z M Salem

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmed M HusseinAnimal Production Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
Hanan A M HassanienAnimal Production Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
Magdy H Abou El-FadelAnimal Production Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
Youssef L PhillipAnimal Production Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
Mohamed M El-BadawyAnimal Production Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
Heba A El-SanafawyAnimal Production Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
Amany A KhayyalAnimal Production Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
Abdelfattah Z M SalemFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, México. salem@uaemex.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7418-4170
Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation · EGUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of rations containing restaurant food waste (RFW) on nutrient digestibility, milk yield and its composition, and some blood parameters of lactating Zaraibi goats. In the last month of pregnancy, 30 goats (32.8 + 0.91 kg body weight and aged 3-4 years) were chosen and divided into three similar groups (10 goats per group). Each group was randomly assigned to be fed one of the experimental rations. The control group (R1) fed on a ration comprising concentrate feed mixture (CFM1) and berseem as a fresh roughage whereas the second (R2) and the third groups (R3) fed on CFM partially substituted by 15 and 30% of RFW (CFM2 and CFM3, respectively). Nutrient digestibility and feeding values were improved with R3 goats, which had the highest level of RFW (30%) versus R2 and R1 goats. The total volatile fatty acid (TVFA) concentration in the in-rumen liquor was elevated by increasing the level of RFW up to 30% in CFM3 of R3 goats. Actual daily milk yields were significantly (P < 0.05) higher (1269.30 g/h/d) for R3 goats versus R1 and R2 (1037.57 and 1180.70 g/h/d, respectively). The inclusion of RFW in rations had a significant effect on the yield of milk constituents, without significant different among experimental rations regarding some blood constituents and offspring performance. Economic feed efficiency (relative feed cost and relative daily profit) was improved by including RFW in the CFM. Therefore, it can be concluded that the inclusion of up to 30% RFW improved productive performance and economic efficiency in lactating Zaraibi goat rations.

Indexed as

MilkRefuse DisposalAnimal FeedAnimalsDietDigestionFemaleFermentationGoatsLactationNutrientsRestaurantsRumenNutrientsDigestibilityGoatsMilk performanceRestaurant food wasteRumen fermentation

Identifiers

PMID35538240
OpenAlexW4280537819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.