Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35538232›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2022

Review and update of the concept of embolic stroke of undetermined source.

Hans-Christoph Diener, J Donald Easton, Robert G Hart, Scott Kasner, Hooman Kamel, George Ntaios

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
14.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Thrombus composition identifies distinct etiologic phenotypes in embolic stroke of undetermined source.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Cryptogenic stroke: definitions and management.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Use of optical coherence tomography in selected patients with recurrent cryptogenic stroke: A case series and technical discussion.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Hans-Christoph DienerDepartment of Neuroepidemiology, Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IMIBE) Medical Faculty of the University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. hans.diener@uk-essen.de.
J Donald EastonDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Robert G HartPopulation Health Research Institute/McMaster University, David Braley Cardiac, Vascular and Stroke Research Institute (DBCVSRI), Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Scott KasnerDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Hooman KamelClinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Department of Neurology and Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
George NtaiosDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0629-9248
Cornell University · USInstitut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie · DEPopulation Health Research Institute · CAUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Thessaly · GR

Funding

AtRial Cardiopathy and Antithrombotic Drugs In prevention After cryptogenicstroke (ARCADIA)U01NS095869 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BRODERICK, JOSEPH PAUL, KAMEL, HOOMAN · 2017 to 2022
$22.0M
NINDS NIH HHS U01NS095869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischaemic strokes have traditionally been classified according to the TOAST criteria, in which strokes with unclear aetiology are classified as cryptogenic strokes. However, the definition of cryptogenic stroke did not meet the operational criteria necessary to define patient populations for randomized treatment trials. To address this problem, the concept of embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) was developed and published in 2014. A hypothesis that underpinned this concept was that most strokes in patients with ESUS are caused by embolic events, perhaps many cardioembolic, and that anticoagulation would prevent secondary ischaemic events. On this basis, two large randomized trials were conducted to compare the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) dabigatran and rivaroxaban with aspirin. Neither NOAC was superior to aspirin in these trials, although subgroups of patients with ESUS seemed to benefit specifically from anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy. The neutral results of the trials of anticoagulation and insights into ESUS from research conducted since the concept was introduced warrant reassessment of the ESUS construct as a research concept and a treatment target. In this Review, we discuss the evidence produced since the concept of ESUS was introduced, and propose updates to the criteria and diagnostic algorithm in light of the latest knowledge.

Indexed as

Embolic StrokeIntracranial EmbolismIschemic StrokeStrokeAdministration, OralAnticoagulantsAspirinHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsAnticoagulantsAspirinPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID35538232
OpenAlexW4229444410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.