Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35538139›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Estimating ranibizumab injection numbers and visual acuity at 12 months based on 2-month data on branch retinal vein occlusion treatment.

Toshinori Murata, Mineo Kondo, Makoto Inoue, Shintaro Nakao, Rie Osaka, Chieko Shiragami, Kenji Sogawa, Akikazu Mochizuki, Rumiko Shiraga, Takeumi Kaneko and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Toshinori MurataDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Shinshu University, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan. murata@shinshu-u.ac.jp.
Mineo KondoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan.
Makoto InoueDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kyorin Eye Center, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shintaro NakaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Rie OsakaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kagawa University Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa, Japan.
Chieko ShiragamiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kagawa University Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa, Japan.
Kenji SogawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Asahikawa Medical University, Hokkaido, Japan.
Akikazu MochizukiNovartis Pharma K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Rumiko ShiragaNovartis Pharma K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Takeumi KanekoNovartis Pharma K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Chikatapu ChandrasekharNovartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, India.
Akitaka TsujikawaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Motohiro KameiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan.
Novartis (Japan) · JPKagawa University · JPAichi Medical University · JPAsahikawa Medical University · JPKyorin University · JPKyoto University · JPKyushu University · JPMie University · JPNovartis (India) · INShinshu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion generally provides good visual acuity (VA) improvement but may require repeated injections for years. To reduce the number of patients who suffer from avoidable VA loss caused by treatment drop-out, providing prospects of the correlation between expected vision improvement and required number of injections at the early stages of treatment may be helpful. In this post hoc analysis of the phase IV, randomized, open-label ZIPANGU study, we investigated the correlation between the data from Month 2 and Month 12 in terms of VA and required ranibizumab injection numbers. Fifty-nine patients were evaluated (ranibizumab monotherapy, 29; combination therapy, 30). In the monotherapy group, patients who received 1 and 3 injections by Month 2 received a mean total of 2.8 and 8.3 injections during the year, respectively. Data from the combination group were similar. The correlation coefficients for VA scores at Months 2 and 12 were 0.60 and 0.51 for the monotherapy and combination groups, respectively (both p < 0.01). Based on VA and injection numbers at Month 2 of treatment, physicians could provide rough prospects on patients' expected final VA and required number of injections.

Indexed as

Macular EdemaRetinal Vein OcclusionAngiogenesis InhibitorsFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntravitreal InjectionsRanibizumabTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVisual AcuityAngiogenesis InhibitorsRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID35538139
PMCPMC9090796
OpenAlexW4280621172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.