Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35538118›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Importance of vaccine action and availability and epidemic severity for delaying the second vaccine dose.

Luděk Berec, René Levínský, Jakub Weiner, Martin Šmíd, Roman Neruda, Petra Vidnerová, Gabriela Suchopárová

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luděk BerecDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Centre for Mathematical Biology, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, 37005, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. lberec@prf.jcu.cz.
René LevínskýCERGE-EI, Politických vězňů 7, 11121, Prague 1, Czech Republic.
Jakub WeinerSiesta Labs, Konopišťská 16, 10000, Prague 10, Czech Republic.
Martin ŠmídThe Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information Theory and Automation, Pod Vodárenskou věží 4, 18200, Prague 8, Czech Republic.
Roman NerudaThe Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Computer Science, Pod Vodárenskou věží 2, 18200, Prague 8, Czech Republic.
Petra VidnerováThe Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Computer Science, Pod Vodárenskou věží 2, 18200, Prague 8, Czech Republic.
Gabriela SuchopárováThe Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Computer Science, Pod Vodárenskou věží 2, 18200, Prague 8, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following initial optimism regarding potentially rapid vaccination, delays and shortages in vaccine supplies occurred in many countries during spring 2021. Various strategies to counter this gloomy reality and speed up vaccination have been set forth, of which the most popular has been to delay the second vaccine dose for a longer period than originally recommended by the manufacturers. Controversy has surrounded this strategy, and overly simplistic models have been developed to shed light on this issue. Here we use three different epidemic models, all accounting for then actual COVID-19 epidemic in the Czech Republic, including the real vaccination rollout, to explore when delaying the second vaccine dose by another 3 weeks from 21 to 42 days is advantageous. Using COVID-19-related deaths as a quantity to compare various model scenarios, we find that the way of vaccine action at the beginning of the infection course (preventing infection and symptoms appearance), mild epidemic and sufficient vaccine supply rate call for the original inter-dose period of 21 days regardless of vaccine efficacy. On the contrary, for the vaccine action at the end of infection course (preventing severe symptoms and death), severe epidemic and low vaccine supply rate, the 42-day inter-dose period is preferable, at any plausible vaccine efficacy.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID35538118
PMCPMC9086670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.