Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35537885›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2022

Management and prognosis of cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiation therapy who have partial metabolic response on post-therapy positron emission tomography.

Tyler R Mckinnish, Molly M Greenwade, Ivy Wilkinson-Ryan, Julie K Schwarz, Matthew A Powell, David G Mutch, L Stewart Massad, Perry W Grigsby, Barry A Siegel, Premal H Thaker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tyler R MckinnishDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: tyler.mckinnish@wustl.edu.
Molly M GreenwadeCoxHealth, Springfield, MO, USA.
Ivy Wilkinson-RyanDartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Julie K SchwarzAlvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Matthew A PowellDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
David G MutchDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
L Stewart MassadDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Perry W GrigsbyAlvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Barry A SiegelAlvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Premal H ThakerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USAlvin J. Siteman Cancer CenterCoxHealth · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · US

Funding

Optimizing radiation therapy through the manipulation of glutamine metabolismR01CA181745 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWARZ, JULIE KRISTINA · 2014 to 2025
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the management and outcomes of cervical cancer patients initially treated with radiation who had partial metabolic response (PMR) on three-month post-radiation

methodsCervical cancer patients treated with radiation between 1997 and 2013 who had PMR on initial post-therapy FDG-PET were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surveillance methods, and treatment modalities. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients who underwent cervical biopsy prior to additional therapies and for patients who were managed with chemotherapy, radiation, surgery or no intervention.

resultsPMR was identified in 81/542 (15%) women on initial post-radiation PET. Thirty women underwent cervical biopsy, of whom 14 (47%) had persistent cancer. Nine underwent treatment, (three surgery, five chemotherapy alone and one chemotherapy and radiation) but all died of disease; PFS and OS were similar whether women had surgery, chemoradiation therapy, or no treatment. A second surveillance FDG-PET had PPV and NPV of 91% and 75% for progression, respectively, and identified the 19% percent of patients with persistent disease outside of the cervix. Cervical biopsy had a higher PPV (100%) and lower NPV (62.5%) for progression. At the end of the study period, 46 (57%) patients were dead of disease, including all 8 patients (100%) with para-aortic or supraclavicular involvement.

conclusionsIf PMR is identified on three-month FDG-PET following completion of radiation for cervical cancer, repeat FDG-PET and/or biopsy are indicated to detect persistence and assist in counseling. PMR predicts poor outcomes, particularly for those with positive cervical biopsies and lymphatic involvement.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID35537885
PMCPMC12168798
OpenAlexW4229334115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.