Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35537793›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Pharmacist interventions to improve hypertension management: protocol for a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Viktoria Gastens, Blanche Kiszio, Cinzia Del Giovane, Ross Tsuyuki, Gilles Paradis, Arnaud Chiolero, Valérie Santschi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Expanding team-based care for hypertension and cardiovascular risk management with HEARTS in the Americas.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Outcome of management based on "1+X" model in a health examination center.American journal of translational research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Viktoria GastensPopulation Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6421-9867
Blanche KiszioLa Source, School of Nursing Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Cinzia Del GiovanePopulation Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5028-932X
Ross TsuyukiEpicore Center, Department of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3724-598X
Gilles ParadisSchool of Population and Global Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Arnaud ChioleroPopulation Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5544-8510
Valérie SantschiLa Source, School of Nursing Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland v.santschi@ecolelasource.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-4452-8857

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHypertension management remains a major public health challenge in primary care. Innovative interventions to improve blood pressure (BP) control are needed. One approach is through community-based models of care with the involvement of pharmacists and other non-physician healthcare professionals. Our objective is to systematically review the evidence of the impact of pharmacist care alone or in collaboration with other healthcare professionals on BP among hypertensive outpatients compared with usual care. Because these interventions can be complex, with various components, the effect size may differ between the type of interventions. One major focus of our study will be to assess carefully the heterogeneity in the effects of these interventions to identify which ones work best in a given healthcare setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Systematic searches of the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica (Embase) and Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases will be conducted. Randomised controlled trials assessing the effect of pharmacist interventions on BP among outpatients will be included. Examples for pharmacist interventions are patient education, feedback to physician and medication management. The outcome will be the change in BP or BP at follow-up or BP control. Results will be synthesised descriptively and, if appropriate, will be pooled across studies to perform meta-analyses. If feasible, we will also perform a network meta-analysis to compare interventions that have not been compared directly head-to-head by using indirect evidence. Heterogeneity in the effect will be evaluated through prespecified subgroup and stratified analyses, accounting notably for the type and intensity of interventions, patients' characteristics and healthcare setting. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as the results will be drawn from currently available published literature. Outcomes of the review will be shared through peer-reviewed journal and used for implementation policy. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021279751.

Indexed as

HypertensionPharmacistsBlood PressureDelivery of Health CareHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicOutpatientsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicCLINICAL PHARMACOLOGYEPIDEMIOLOGYHEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENTHypertensionPREVENTIVE MEDICINEPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID35537793
PMCPMC9092164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.