Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35537786›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2022

Short-term and long-term prognostic value of histological response and intensified chemotherapy in osteosarcoma: a retrospective reanalysis of the BO06 trial.

Eni Musta, Nan van Geloven, Jakob Anninga, Hans Gelderblom, Marta Fiocco

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Eni MustaKorteweg-de Vries Institute for Mathematics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands e.musta@uva.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-3356-4307
Nan van GelovenDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5600-9093
Jakob AnningaDepartment of Solid Tumours, Princess Máxima Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hans GelderblomDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marta FioccoDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLLeiden University · NLPrincess Máxima Center · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCure rate models accounting for cured and uncured patients, provide additional insights into long and short-term survival. We aim to evaluate the prognostic value of histological response and chemotherapy intensification on the cure fraction and progression-free survival (PFS) for the uncured patients.

designRetrospective analysis of a randomised controlled trial, MRC BO06 (EORTC 80931).

settingPopulation-based study but proposed methodology can be applied to other trial designs.

participantsA total of 497 patients with resectable highgrade osteosarcoma, of which 118 were excluded because chemotherapy was not started, histological response was not reported, abnormal dose was reported or had disease progression during treatment.

interventionsTwo regimens with the same anticipated cumulative dose (doxorubicin 6×75 mg/m PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is PFS computed from end of treatment because cure, if it occurs, may happen at any time during treatment. A mixture cure model is used to study the effect of histological response and intensified chemotherapy on the cure status and PFS for the uncured patients.

resultsHistological response is a strong prognostic factor for the cure status (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.75 to 5.17), but it has no clear effect on PFS for the uncured patients (HR 0.78, -95% CI 0.53 to 1.16). The cure fractions are 55% (46%-63%) and 29% (22%-35%), respectively, among patients with good and poor histological response (GR, PR). The intensified regimen was associated with a higher cure fraction among PR (OR 1.90, 95% CI 0.93 to 3.89), with no evidence of effect for GR (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.59).

conclusionsAccounting for cured patients is valuable in distinguishing the covariate effects on cure and PFS. Estimating cure chances based on these prognostic factors is relevant for counselling patients and can have an impact on treatment decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN86294690.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsOsteosarcomaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansPrognosisRetrospective Studieschemotherapypaediatric oncologysarcomastatistics & research methodssurgery

Identifiers

PMID35537786
PMCPMC9092180
OpenAlexW4280509402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.