Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35537665›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2022

Comparison of automatic liver volumetry performance using different types of magnetic resonance images.

Sara L Saunders, Justin M Clark, Kyle Rudser, Anil Chauhan, Justin R Ryder, Patrick J Bolan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara L SaundersDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota College of Science and Engineering, United States of America; Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota Medical School Twin Cities, United States of America.
Justin M ClarkDivision of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, United States of America.
Kyle RudserDivision of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, United States of America.
Anil ChauhanDepartment of Radiology, University of Minnesota Medical School Twin Cities, United States of America.
Justin R RyderDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School Twin Cities, United States of America; Center for Pediatric Obesity Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School Twin Cities, United States of America.
Patrick J BolanCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota Medical School Twin Cities, United States of America. Electronic address: bola0035@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota · USResonance Research (United States) · US

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
TRD4 - Ultrahigh Field Engineering and SafetyP41EB027061 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Gregory John Metzger, KAMIL UGURBIL · 2019 to 2026
$11.7M
Enhancing Weight Loss Maintenance with GLP-1 in Adolescents with Severe ObesityR01DK105953 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KELLY, AARON S · 2015 to 2019
$3.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027061NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK105953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurements of liver volume from MR images can be valuable for both clinical and research applications. Automated methods using convolutional neural networks have been used successfully for this using a variety of different MR image types as input. In this work, we sought to determine which types of magnetic resonance images give the best performance when used to train convolutional neural networks for liver segmentation and volumetry. Abdominal MRI scans were performed at 3 Tesla on 42 adolescents with obesity. Scans included Dixon imaging (giving water, fat, and T2* images) and low-resolution T2-weighted scout images. Multiple convolutional neural network models using a 3D U-Net architecture were trained with different input images. Whole-liver manual segmentations were used for reference. Segmentation performance was measured using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff distance. Liver volume accuracy was evaluated using bias, precision, intraclass correlation coefficient, normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), and Bland-Altman analyses. The models trained using both water and fat images performed best, giving DSC = 0.94 and NRMSE = 4.2%. Models trained without the water image as input all performed worse, including in participants with elevated liver fat. Models using the T2-weighted scout images underperformed the Dixon-based models, but provided acceptable performance (DSC ≥ 0.92, NMRSE ≤6.6%) for use in longitudinal pediatric obesity interventions. The model using Dixon water and fat images as input gave the best performance, with results comparable to inter-reader variability and state-of-the-art methods.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentChildHumansLiverNeural Networks, ComputerWaterWaterConvolutional neural networksDixonMRINAFLDSegmentationVolumetry

Identifiers

PMID35537665
PMCPMC9812021
OpenAlexW4229027164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.