Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35537296›Full record

ArticleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2022

Study on transfer learning capabilities for pneumonia classification in chest-x-rays images.

Danilo Avola, Andrea Bacciu, Luigi Cinque, Alessio Fagioli, Marco Raoul Marini, Riccardo Taiello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Danilo AvolaDepartment of Computer Science, Sapienza University, Via Salaria 113, Rome 00185, Italy.
Andrea BacciuDepartment of Computer Science, Sapienza University, Via Salaria 113, Rome 00185, Italy.
Luigi CinqueDepartment of Computer Science, Sapienza University, Via Salaria 113, Rome 00185, Italy.
Alessio FagioliDepartment of Computer Science, Sapienza University, Via Salaria 113, Rome 00185, Italy. Electronic address: fagioli@di.uniroma1.it.
Marco Raoul MariniDepartment of Computer Science, Sapienza University, Via Salaria 113, Rome 00185, Italy.
Riccardo TaielloDepartment of Computer Science, Sapienza University, Via Salaria 113, Rome 00185, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundover the last year, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its variants have highlighted the importance of screening tools with high diagnostic accuracy for new illnesses such as COVID-19. In that regard, deep learning approaches have proven as effective solutions for pneumonia classification, especially when considering chest-x-rays images. However, this lung infection can also be caused by other viral, bacterial or fungi pathogens. Consequently, efforts are being poured toward distinguishing the infection source to help clinicians to diagnose the correct disease origin. Following this tendency, this study further explores the effectiveness of established neural network architectures on the pneumonia classification task through the transfer learning paradigm. METHODOLOGY: to present a comprehensive comparison, 12 well-known ImageNet pre-trained models were fine-tuned and used to discriminate among chest-x-rays of healthy people, and those showing pneumonia symptoms derived from either a viral (i.e., generic or SARS-CoV-2) or bacterial source. Furthermore, since a common public collection distinguishing between such categories is currently not available, two distinct datasets of chest-x-rays images, describing the aforementioned sources, were combined and employed to evaluate the various architectures.

resultsthe experiments were performed using a total of 6330 images split between train, validation, and test sets. For all models, standard classification metrics were computed (e.g., precision, f1-score), and most architectures obtained significant performances, reaching, among the others, up to 84.46% average f1-score when discriminating the four identified classes. Moreover, execution times, areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), confusion matrices, activation maps computed via the Grad-CAM algorithm, and additional experiments to assess the robustness of each model using only 50%, 20%, and 10% of the training set were also reported to present an informed discussion on the networks classifications.

conclusionthis paper examines the effectiveness of well-known architectures on a joint collection of chest-x-rays presenting pneumonia cases derived from either viral or bacterial sources, with particular attention to SARS-CoV-2 contagions for viral pathogens; demonstrating that existing architectures can effectively diagnose pneumonia sources and suggesting that the transfer learning paradigm could be a crucial asset in diagnosing future unknown illnesses.

Indexed as

COVID-19Deep LearningPneumoniaHumansSARS-CoV-2X-RaysDeep learningExplainable AIPneumonia classificationTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID35537296
PMCPMC9033299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.