Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35537273›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2022

Reinforcement learning and Bayesian inference provide complementary models for the unique advantage of adolescents in stochastic reversal.

Maria K Eckstein, Sarah L Master, Ronald E Dahl, Linda Wilbrecht, Anne G E Collins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prefrontal cortex development and its implications in mental illness.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  5. Investigating hierarchical critical periods in human neurodevelopment.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Social inequity disrupts reward-based learning.Communications psychology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The beautiful adolescent brain: An evolutionary developmental perspective.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Revisiting the role of computational neuroimaging in the era of integrative neuroscience.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria K EcksteinDepartment of Psychology, 2121 Berkeley Way West, USA. Electronic address: maria.eckstein@berkeley.edu.
Sarah L MasterDepartment of Psychology, 2121 Berkeley Way West, USA.
Ronald E DahlInstitute of Human Development, 2121 Berkeley Way West, USA.
Linda WilbrechtDepartment of Psychology, 2121 Berkeley Way West, USA; Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, 175 Li Ka Shing Center, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Anne G E CollinsDepartment of Psychology, 2121 Berkeley Way West, USA.
Berkeley College · USInstitute for Human Development · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During adolescence, youth venture out, explore the wider world, and are challenged to learn how to navigate novel and uncertain environments. We investigated how performance changes across adolescent development in a stochastic, volatile reversal-learning task that uniquely taxes the balance of persistence and flexibility. In a sample of 291 participants aged 8-30, we found that in the mid-teen years, adolescents outperformed both younger and older participants. We developed two independent cognitive models, based on Reinforcement learning (RL) and Bayesian inference (BI). The RL parameter for learning from negative outcomes and the BI parameters specifying participants' mental models were closest to optimal in mid-teen adolescents, suggesting a central role in adolescent cognitive processing. By contrast, persistence and noise parameters improved monotonically with age. We distilled the insights of RL and BI using principal component analysis and found that three shared components interacted to form the adolescent performance peak: adult-like behavioral quality, child-like time scales, and developmentally-unique processing of positive feedback. This research highlights adolescence as a neurodevelopmental window that can create performance advantages in volatile and uncertain environments. It also shows how detailed insights can be gleaned by using cognitive models in new ways.

Indexed as

AttentionReinforcement, PsychologyAdolescentAdolescent DevelopmentAdultBayes TheoremHumansReversal LearningAdolescenceBayesian inferenceComputational modelingDevelopmentNon-linear changesReinforcement learningVolatility

Identifiers

PMID35537273
PMCPMC9108470
OpenAlexW3199725660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.