Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35537102›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2022

Basket Trials: Review of Current Practice and Innovations for Future Trials.

Brian P Hobbs, Roberto Carmagnani Pestana, Emily C Zabor, Alexander M Kaizer, David S Hong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Augmented binary method for basket trials (ABBA).Statistical methods in medical research · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Biomarker-Driven Treatments for Ovarian Cancer: Moving Beyond HRD?International journal of women's health · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian P HobbsDell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.ORCID 0000-0003-2189-5846
Roberto Carmagnani PestanaCentro de Oncologia e Hematologia Einstein Familia Dayan-Daycoval, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1141-7608
Emily C ZaborQuantitative Health Sciences & Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-1402-4498
Alexander M KaizerBiostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.ORCID 0000-0003-2334-5514
David S HongInvestigational Cancer Therapeutics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0001-8721-1609

Funding

Statistical Methods and Adaptive Trial Designs for Cardiovascular Outcomes with Information SharingK01HL151754 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KAIZER, ALEXANDER MARK · 2021 to 2025
$742k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL151754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in biology and immunology have elucidated genetic and immunologic origins of cancer. Innovations in sequencing technologies revealed that distinct cancer histologies shared common genetic and immune phenotypic traits. Pharmacologic developments made it possible to target these alterations, yielding novel classes of targeted agents whose therapeutic potential span multiple tumor types. Basket trials, one type of master protocol, emerged as a tool for evaluating biomarker-targeted therapies among multiple tumor histologies. Conventionally conducted within the phase II setting and designed to estimate high and durable objective responses, basket trials pose challenges to statistical design and interpretation of results. This article reviews basket trials implemented in oncology studies and discusses issues related to their statistical design and analysis.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsHumansMedical OncologyResearch DesignAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID35537102
PMCPMC10476732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.