Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35536852›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Commissioning a newly developed treatment planning system, VQA Plan, for fast-raster scanning of carbon-ion beams.

Masashi Yagi, Toshiro Tsubouchi, Noriaki Hamatani, Masaaki Takashina, Hiroyasu Maruo, Shinichiro Fujitaka, Hideaki Nihongi, Kazuhiko Ogawa, Tatsuaki Kanai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Masashi YagiDepartment of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita-city, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2827-5407
Toshiro TsubouchiDepartment of Medical Physics, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Chuo-ku, Osaka-city, Osaka, Japan.
Noriaki HamataniDepartment of Medical Physics, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Chuo-ku, Osaka-city, Osaka, Japan.
Masaaki TakashinaDepartment of Medical Physics, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Chuo-ku, Osaka-city, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroyasu MaruoDepartment of Radiation Technology, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Chuo-ku, Osaka-city, Osaka, Japan.
Shinichiro FujitakaHitachi, Ltd. Research & Development Group, Hitachi-shi, Ibaraki, Japan.
Hideaki NihongiHitachi, Ltd. Smart Life Business Management Division/Healthcare Business Division, KOIL TERRACE 3F 226-44-141-1, Wakashiba, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba, Japan.
Kazuhiko OgawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita-city, Osaka, Japan.
Tatsuaki KanaiDepartment of Medical Physics, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Chuo-ku, Osaka-city, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we report our experience in commissioning a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) for fast-raster scanning of carbon-ion beams. This TPS uses an analytical dose calculation algorithm, a pencil-beam model with a triple Gaussian form for the lateral-dose distribution, and a beam splitting algorithm to consider lateral heterogeneity in a medium. We adopted the mixed beam model as the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) model for calculating the RBE values of the scanned carbon-ion beam. To validate the modeled physical dose, we compared the calculations with measurements of various relevant quantities as functions of the field size, range and width of the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP), and depth-dose and lateral-dose profiles for a 6-mm SOBP in water. To model the biological dose, we compared the RBE calculated with the newly developed TPS to the RBE calculated with a previously validated TPS that is in clinical use and uses the same RBE model concept. We also performed patient-specific measurements to validate the dose model in clinical situations. The physical beam model reproduces the measured absolute dose at the center of the SOBP as a function of field size, range, and SOBP width and reproduces the dose profiles for a 6-mm SOBP in water. However, the profiles calculated for a heterogeneous phantom have some limitations in predicting the carbon-ion-beam dose, although the biological doses agreed well with the values calculated by the validated TPS. Using this dose model for fast-raster scanning, we successfully treated more than 900 patients from October 2018 to October 2020, with an acceptable agreement between the TPS-calculated and measured dose distributions. We conclude that the newly developed TPS can be used clinically with the understanding that it has limited accuracies for heterogeneous media.

Indexed as

Proton TherapyCarbonHumansMonte Carlo MethodPhantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRelative Biological EffectivenessWaterCarbonWater

Identifiers

PMID35536852
PMCPMC9089877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.