ArticlePloS one2022
Commissioning a newly developed treatment planning system, VQA Plan, for fast-raster scanning of carbon-ion beams.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Outcomes of Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Unresectable Radiation-Induced Secondary Sarcoma.International journal of particle therapy · 2026Article
- For ultra-high dose rate carbon-ion irradiation, comparable beam parameters induce the equivalent cell sparing (FLASH) effect.Journal of radiation research · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of carbon-ion radiotherapy for large hepatocellular carcinoma (diameter ≥ 10 cm).BMC cancer · 2026Article
- A Novel Method for Prognostic Risk Classification After Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Data-Mining Methods.Cancer science · 2025Article
- Commissioning of a commercial treatment planning system for scanned carbon-ion radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Assessing the robustness of dose distributions in carbon ion prostate radiotherapy using a fast dose evaluation system.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Dosimetric impact of stopping power for human bone porosity with dual-energy computed tomography in scanned carbon-ion therapy treatment planning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Technical Note: Improving the workflow in a carbon ion therapy center with custom software for enhanced patient care.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Development and characterization of a dedicated dose monitor for ultrahigh-dose-rate scanned carbon-ion beams.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prognostic analysis of radiation-induced liver damage following carbon-ion radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- The rationale for a carbon ion radiation therapy facility in Australia.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2024Review
- Commissioning and Validation of CT Number to SPR Calibration in Carbon Ion Therapy Facility.International journal of particle therapy · 2024Article
- Article
- Validation of robust radiobiological optimization algorithms based on the mixed beam model for intensity-modulated carbon-ion therapy.PloS one · 2023Article
- Physical and biological beam modeling for carbon beam scanning at Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
- Three-dimensional Patient-specific Quality Assurance Using Beam Delivery Log Data for Pencil Beam Scanning Carbon-ion Radiotherapy.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- Investigation of Ionization Chamber Characteristics for Ultrahigh-dose-rate Scanned Carbon-ion Beams.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we report our experience in commissioning a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) for fast-raster scanning of carbon-ion beams. This TPS uses an analytical dose calculation algorithm, a pencil-beam model with a triple Gaussian form for the lateral-dose distribution, and a beam splitting algorithm to consider lateral heterogeneity in a medium. We adopted the mixed beam model as the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) model for calculating the RBE values of the scanned carbon-ion beam. To validate the modeled physical dose, we compared the calculations with measurements of various relevant quantities as functions of the field size, range and width of the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP), and depth-dose and lateral-dose profiles for a 6-mm SOBP in water. To model the biological dose, we compared the RBE calculated with the newly developed TPS to the RBE calculated with a previously validated TPS that is in clinical use and uses the same RBE model concept. We also performed patient-specific measurements to validate the dose model in clinical situations. The physical beam model reproduces the measured absolute dose at the center of the SOBP as a function of field size, range, and SOBP width and reproduces the dose profiles for a 6-mm SOBP in water. However, the profiles calculated for a heterogeneous phantom have some limitations in predicting the carbon-ion-beam dose, although the biological doses agreed well with the values calculated by the validated TPS. Using this dose model for fast-raster scanning, we successfully treated more than 900 patients from October 2018 to October 2020, with an acceptable agreement between the TPS-calculated and measured dose distributions. We conclude that the newly developed TPS can be used clinically with the understanding that it has limited accuracies for heterogeneous media.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.