Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35536844›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Foundational ingredients of robotic gait training for people with incomplete spinal cord injury during inpatient rehabilitation (FIRST): A randomized controlled trial protocol.

Chad Swank, Alexandria Holden, Lacy McDonald, Simon Driver, Librada Callender, Monica Bennett, Seema Sikka

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04781621 (Foundational Ingredients of Robotic Gait Training for People With Spinal Cord Injury During Inpatient Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04781621 nacompletednot on this map

Foundational Ingredients of Robotic Gait Training for People With Spinal Cord Injury During Inpatient Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaylor Research InstituteRan2021 to 2024Enrolled115ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuriesArmsRobotic Gait Training, Usual Care Gait Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chad SwankBaylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Alexandria HoldenBaylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9533-9872
Lacy McDonaldBaylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Simon DriverBaylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Librada CallenderBaylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Monica BennettBaylor Scott & White Health, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Seema SikkaBaylor Scott & White Institute for Rehabilitation, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Baylor Medical Center at Garland · USBaylor Scott & White Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs technological advances allow the use of robotic exoskeleton devices with gait training, there is a critical need to establish a robotic gait training (RGT) program to meet the needs of people with spinal cord injury (SCI) during inpatient rehabilitation. The purposes of this study are to prospectively examine the efficacy of a stakeholder informed RGT program compared to usual care gait training (UC) during inpatient rehabilitation in people with incomplete SCI and compare the intensity of RGT and UC gait training during inpatient rehabilitation. STUDY

design128 patients with incomplete SCI admitted to our inpatient rehabilitation facility will be screened for eligibility and randomized to either the RGT or UC group. RGT sessions will use the Ekso robotic exoskeleton [class II medical device (United States FDA)]. UC sessions will use traditional gait training approaches such as manually assisted overground gait training with walkers and orthotics and body weight-supported treadmill training (BWSTT). Our primary outcome is gait function as characterized by the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury-II (WISCI-II). Secondary outcomes are gait speed, Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), General Anxiety Disorder- 7 (GAD-7), International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set, and a Qualitative Questionnaire. Assessments of primary and secondary outcomes will occur at admission and discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. General or generalized linear models will be used to analyze differences between groups for all measures. CLINICAL IMPACT: Successful completion of this study will provide a usable, replicable, stakeholder informed RGT intervention for use with individuals with incomplete SCI during inpatient rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceRobotic Surgical ProceduresSpinal Cord InjuriesGaitHumansInpatientsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWalking

Identifiers

PMID35536844
PMCPMC9089894
OpenAlexW4280599879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.