Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35536838›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2022

Effective interventions to ensure MCH (Maternal and Child Health) services during pandemic related health emergencies (Zika, Ebola, and COVID-19): A systematic review.

Subrata Kumar Palo, Shubhankar Dubey, Sapna Negi, Mili Roopchand Sahay, Kripalini Patel, Swagatika Swain, Bijaya Kumar Mishra, Dinesh Bhuyan, Srikanta Kanungo, Meena Som and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Subrata Kumar PaloICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Shubhankar DubeyICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6184-6662
Sapna NegiICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6432-6830
Mili Roopchand SahayICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0123-3431
Kripalini PatelICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Swagatika SwainICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Bijaya Kumar MishraICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Dinesh BhuyanICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2361-5350
Srikanta KanungoICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Meena SomUnited Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9739-5974
Brajesh Raj MertaUnited Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), Odisha, India.
Debdutta BhattacharyaICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5199-5288
Jaya Singh KshatriICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Sanghamitra PatiICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7717-5592
Regional Medical Research Centre · INUnited Nations Children's Fund India · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEnsuring accessible and quality health care for women and children is an existing challenge, which is further exacerbated during pandemics. There is a knowledge gap about the effect of pandemics on maternal, newborn, and child well-being. This systematic review was conducted to study maternal and child health (MCH) services utilization during pandemics (Zika, Ebola, and COVID-19) and the effectiveness of various interventions undertaken for ensuring utilization of MCH services. METHODOLOGY: A systematic and comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, Epistemonikos, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Of 5643 citations, 60 potential studies were finally included for analysis. The included studies were appraised using JBI Critical appraisal tools. Study selection and data extraction were done independently and in duplicate. Findings are presented narratively based on the RMNCHA framework by World Health Organization (WHO).

resultsMaternal and child health services such as antenatal care (ANC) visits, institutional deliveries, immunization uptake, were greatly affected during a pandemic situation. Innovative approaches in form of health care services through virtual consultation, patient triaging, developing dedicated COVID maternity centers and maternity schools were implemented in different places for ensuring continuity of MCH care during pandemics. None of the studies reported the effectiveness of these interventions during pandemic-related health emergencies.

conclusionThe findings suggest that during pandemics, MCH care utilization often gets affected. Many innovative interventions were adopted to ensure MCH services. However, they lack evidence about their effectiveness. It is critically important to implement evidence-based appropriate interventions for better MCH care utilization.

Indexed as

COVID-19Hemorrhagic Fever, EbolaMaternal-Child Health ServicesMaternal Health ServicesZika VirusZika Virus InfectionChildChild HealthEmergenciesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPandemicsPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35536838
PMCPMC9089853
OpenAlexW4229452429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.